AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jan Ford

MATH · MATH176 · MTH178 · MATG175 · MATH110 · MATH175 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take Jan Ford only if you already have solid math skills and are ready to keep up with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast PacedHard TestsHelpful Outside ClassBoring LecturesRequires Strong Math Skills
  • Students repeatedly describe the classes as fast paced with and finals.
  • Helpfulness is a strength, but lecture engagement and clarity are inconsistent.
  • Getting a good , and prior math confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A appears possible, but only with , and strong test preparation.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is repeatedly described as fast paced, , and demanding for students without prior math strength.

All difficulty evidence comes from in-person math classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Students specifically advise attending every class and imply that missing class makes it hard to keep up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students appreciate her help, but many hesitate because the lectures are boring and exams are hard.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and one complaint about unfair grading, with little evidence of leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students , and prepare deeply for tests.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often called helpful and , but many students describe the pace as too fast and lectures as boring.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments focus heavily on tests, hard finals, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but often boring professor whose math classes move quickly and .

Main concern

The main concern is fast pacing with hard exams that can overwhelm weaker math students.

What students said

“Very fast pace. Very boring. Do not take her 176 class.”
MATH176
“ if you are VERY confident in your math skills.”
MATH176
“Will earn A if u put in the effort.”
MTH178

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as challenging, long, and demanding, with .

Challenging TestsLong TestsHard FinalHomework-Like Exam Problems

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a scary final that require knowing the material well.

Challenging TestsLong TestsHard Final
“ .”
MATH176
“The .”
MATH176
“ know the material well”
MATH175

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are VERY confident in your math skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ , but boring, and skips around in the material a lot.”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

38/100

“Will earn A if u put in the effort.”

📝

30/100

“ so you have to know your stuff in order to have time to finish the test”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Teacher. Very helpful and with great math insight.
  • Very fast pace. Very boring. Do not take her 176 class.
  • But though she makes a ton of mistakes!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • if you are VERY confident in your math skills.
  • Will earn A if u put in the effort.
  • , and fast paced.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • .
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews provide consistent themes, but the reviews are old and lack grade data.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1767 reviews
MATH1755 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MATG1751 review
MATH1 review
Show 1 more courses
MTH1781 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values