AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rory Shipowick

MATHMATH · MATH178 · MATH90 · MATH120 · MATH110 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself under heavy pressure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast PacedHard TestsLow SympathySelf Study RequiredHeavy Workload
  • Students repeatedly , and little help for struggling learners.
  • Success seems possible only for , and work hard.
  • No online reviews are available, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A , and keeping up with frequent tests.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content is made harder , and little support for slow learners.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently frame the course as .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Students say to show up every class because missing fast lectures makes it easy to fall behind.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students warn against taking him because the teaching is fast, unsympathetic, and confusing.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Frequent tests and high , though exact grading policy is not clearly described.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss the course, with .

Workload

Heavy

15/100

Students mention hard studying, MathXL costs, fast pacing, and a test almost every week.

Format shift

The heavy workload pattern appears only in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Comments often describe confusing , and low sympathy.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews strongly emphasize frequent tests, including one comment saying to expect a .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and a need for heavy self-study.

Main concern

.

What students said

“he teaches very fast, if you snooze you loose!!”
MATHMATH
“he teaches really fast and .”
MATH178
“BAD teacher”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because students report frequent tests, but reviews do .

Frequent TestsWeekly Test PatternNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Frequent TestsWeekly Test Pattern
“expect !!”
MATHMATH
“he tries to fit a ”
MATH178

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're a lazy student (like many) don't think you'll be able to blow his class off.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“This teacher is by far the ”

📈 Difficulty & Pace

25/100

“he teaches really fast and .”

🧪

30/100

“expect !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he teaches very fast, if you snooze you loose!!
  • he teaches really fast and .
  • BAD teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Effort

  • I managed to succeed in , and studying hard.
  • If you're a lazy student (like many) don't think you'll be able to blow his class off.
  • it was a hard class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed but old reviews are fairly consistent about fast pacing and difficult in-person classes.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1101 review
MATH1201 review
MATH1781 review
MATH901 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values