AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Mathematics

Ryan More

MATH285 · MATH180 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a clear and fair math professor and can handle a serious workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear ExplanationsFair ProfessorHeavy WorkloadTough ClassHelpful Worksheets
  • Students strongly praise his clarity, fairness, and ability to make difficult material understandable.
  • The course content and workload are demanding, especially in math-heavy classes.
  • Success and not falling behind.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A seems possible with and concept mastery, but the workload keeps it from being easy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The classes are explicitly described as tough and difficult, even though .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, but they .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend him because , and makes hard math more manageable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Students call him extremely fair, but there is no evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

One review says there is a lot of work, and another says students should do the homework and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Both reviews praise his clarity, fairness, humor, worksheets, and ability to clarify difficult material.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention homework and worksheets but .

Format shift

structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe an excellent professor teaching difficult, work-heavy math courses clearly and fairly.

Main concern

The workload is heavy and students who slack off may struggle.

What students said

“But it is a tough class, so don't slack off.”
MATH180
“Great professor, difficult class.”
MATH285
“there is a LOT of work involved.”
MATH285

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor, difficult class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality, workload, and fairness; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“ and his worksheets help a lot too!”

📚 Workload

28/100

“there is a LOT of work involved.”

👍 Recommendation Level

88/100

“He's extremely fair and he's got a pretty good sense of humor which makes the class bearable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and his worksheets help a lot too!
  • the guy does a great job clarifying everything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • But it is a tough class, so don't slack off.
  • Great professor, difficult class.
  • there is a LOT of work involved.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness

  • He's extremely fair and he's got a pretty good sense of humor which makes the class bearable.
  • to understand the concepts and you should be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the praise is consistent but the evidence base is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1801 review
MATH2851 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values