AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Mathematics

Jacqueline Hamed

MATH120 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can learn independently from the book and posted notes.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear NotesLow Lecture ValueBook-Based TeachingHard to Follow
  • The only review describes lecture notes copied from the book with few examples.
  • because the .
  • Teaching quality appears weak, but credibility is limited by one old review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The review gives no grade evidence and reports a difficult class experience with weak examples, so an A likely requires self-teaching.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course seems challenging because the teaching relies on dense notes with little practice or explanation.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

because the same notes are posted on Blackboard.

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The student strongly questions the value of attending and describes the teaching as inexperienced.

Evidence comes .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

There is no direct grading evidence, but the high difficulty and weak .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review focuses on poor lecture , so .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Teaching is described as book-based, example-light, and hard to concentrate on.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review describes hard-to-follow lectures with little added value beyond Blackboard notes.

Main concern

Lecture delivery adds little beyond typed notes from the book.

What students said

“Really, there's no point in showing up since these notes are on BlackBoard.”
MATH120
“She seems pretty new to the teaching world.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really, there's no point in showing up since these notes are on BlackBoard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She started out writing out notes (with little to no examples/exercises) straight out of the book.”

⚠️

85/100

“Really, there's no point in showing up since these notes are on BlackBoard.”

📉 Course Experience

20/100

“She seems pretty new to the teaching world.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She started out writing out notes (with little to no examples/exercises) straight out of the book.
  • Now, she just types them out and because now it's just a bunch of words.

Theme 2

📌

  • Really, there's no point in showing up since these notes are on BlackBoard.
  • She seems pretty new to the teaching world.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review with limited detail beyond lecture style.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values