AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Computer Information Systems

Steve Perry

CIS219 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can work independently and are comfortable with uneven instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOrganized WebsiteMixed ResponsivenessLimited ExplanationFlexible DeadlinesFrustrating Course
  • Students agree the website or , but disagree sharply on instructor support.
  • One review praises his patience and flexibility, while another and .
  • The material can be challenging and may require independent learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Flexible late work helps, but , and limited support mean the grade is not effortless.

All though student wording describes an online class.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course challenges students and requires self-direction because .

, so no official online comparison can be made.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

The reviews describe a website-based class and flexibility with .

Evidence comes from in-person-counted reviews whose comments describe online delivery.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students may value the organization and flexibility, but support quality is too mixed for a strong recommendation.

Only in-person-counted reviews exist, and they conflict .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Flexibility with , but there is too little evidence to call it generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is not clearly described as heavy, but frustration and challenging material make it feel demanding.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Organization and some responsiveness are positives, but explanations and student support are inconsistent.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The comments emphasize assignments and late submissions, with .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Authoritative format counts classify both reviews as in person, though the comments describe an online-style CIS course with mixed support.

Main concern

Instructor help and .

What students said

“The schedule and .”
CIS219
“Material could have been explained better or more thoroughly.”
CIS219
“ ”
CIS219

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or exam format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Material could have been explained better or more thoroughly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in organization, support, and challenge. Credibility rating: Low.

🧭 Course Organization

70/100

“The schedule and .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Material could have been explained better or more thoroughly.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

42/100

“ , and responses negatively if asking question.”

Theme 1

💻 About Course Setup

  • Online class w/ a good website interface.
  • The schedule and .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Instructor Support

  • He always responded to my questions, even when I was short due to my frustration.

Theme 3

📈 About Challenge & Flexibility

  • it challenged me and got me thinking.
  • Flexible with turning in assignments late.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they conflict on instructor helpfulness.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS2192 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values