AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Philosophy

Roy Whitaker

RELG120 · PHIL130 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and , and difficult tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesHeavy homeworkPoor test writingStrict grading pathLow recommendation
  • Students describe Whitaker's teaching as , and difficult to follow.
  • Reviews , and little chance to improve grades.
  • The as tricky and based on trivial details.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting a high grade appears difficult because students report , and little chance to raise grades.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels difficult mainly because lectures and because students describe rewarding intellectual challenge.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe confusion and workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention class participation but .

In-person comments give no direct proof of .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Students largely advise against taking him because the , and tests feel unfair.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students report little chance to raise grades and .

Format shift

and assessment difficulty.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

One review directly , and another criticizes extensive lecture.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Reviews repeatedly describe Whitaker as , and ineffective at teaching.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention and tests, so assessment seems split between assignments and exams.

Format shift

and tests, with no online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and frustrating tests.

Main concern

The main concern is poor clarity combined with high workload and tricky assessments.

What students said

“ . Does not know how to teach.”
PHIL130
“ .”
PHIL130
“ trip up students.”
RELG120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy, but as tricky and unfairly written.

Tricky testsTrivial test questionsExam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grade recovery, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, midterm, final, or proctoring details.

Tricky testsTrivial questionsLittle grade recovery
“ trip up students.”
RELG120
“Very little chance to raise your grade.”
PHIL130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Does not know how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, workload, and test risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ . Does not know how to teach.”

📚 Workload Reality

22/100

“ .”

📝

25/100

“ trip up students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Does not know how to teach.
  • All lecture.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very little chance to raise your grade.
  • .
  • 98% of homeowork is gone over in class and not turned in.

Theme 3

📝 About Tests

  • trip up students.
  • Gives biased attention to some religions that he's okay with, and others he'll leave out vital information!
  • Didn't learn anything in this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are detailed and consistently negative about clarity, workload, and tests.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1302 reviews
RELG1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values