AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Debra Worth

ANTH300 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you are comfortable with , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasHeavy SlidesHarsh GradingSelf TeachingPolarized Experience
  • Most reviews describe poor communication, disorganization, and students feeling left to teach themselves.
  • Online reviews are consistently negative, with heavy slide reading and little instructor interaction.
  • One in-person review is strongly positive, but it is outweighed and course structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A high grade is possible, but multiple students , and heavy reading that make the A costly.

Online evidence points to heavy self-teaching, while and one easy positive experience.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content may be graspable for some students, but the course feels difficult because of , and limited guidance.

Online reviews make the course feel harder through self-teaching, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict or .

Neither online nor in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend the course because they describe , and little support.

Online reviews are consistently negative, while but two severe warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly mention tough or and the midterm.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both include tough grading concerns, though .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

The workload is heavy because students report thousands of slides, 100-plus slide lectures, reading pressure, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize overwhelming slide reading, while and a comprehensive final.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most students describe weak communication and organization, though and engaging.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as absent or abandoned, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a comprehensive final, so assessment appears mixed between coursework and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussion posts and test-heavy structure, while , and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between one very positive lecture experience and two and poor communication.

Main concern

Grading and as harsh or unhelpful in the negative reviews.

What students said

“ , and grades the midterm (20% of grade) extremely harshly.”
ANTH300
“she gives amazing lectures and her material is very easy to grasp.”
ANTH300

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report , and disorganized structure.

Main concern

Students felt abandoned and had .

What students said

“It felt like I was basically teaching myself the entire semester with 0 interaction from her outside of making comments while .”
ANTH300
“ online. Thousands of . I felt abandoned to .”
ANTH300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews confirm a midterm, a comprehensive final, and test-heavy elements, but they .

MidtermComprehensive FinalTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

MidtermComprehensive Final
“grades the midterm (20% of grade) extremely harshly. .”
ANTH300

Online

Online reviews mention the course is test heavy, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Test Heavy
“ and relies on the syllabus rather than telling students what they need to do to pass.”
ANTH300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class is genuinely a disaster.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ online. Thousands of . I felt abandoned to .”

⚖️

18/100

“grades the midterm (20% of grade) extremely harshly.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • online. Thousands of .
  • she gives amazing lectures and her material is very easy to grasp.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • She recommends to print the ppt. lectures every week that are on average 100+ slides and very color heavy.
  • Lots of slides
  • Thousands of .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • grades the midterm (20% of grade) extremely harshly.
  • She does not give feedback for .
  • the syllabus.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews across both formats give useful evidence, but opinions are polarized and mostly from one course.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ANTH3006 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values