AI Rate Professor

English

Lisa Danner

ENGWR · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.9

The decision

unless you specifically want a very harsh writing course with heavy workload and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderAI AccusationsHeavy WritingHarsh FeedbackAvoid
  • Students , and repeated AI accusations.
  • The workload is heavy, with lots of reading, writing, papers, and weekly essays reported.
  • Recommendation evidence is extremely negative across both online and in-person reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students say grades are hard to earn because of , and heavy writing.

Both formats show severe grade risk, with online reviews emphasizing AI accusations and weekly essays and in-person reviews emphasizing failure and dropping.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course feels very difficult because students report , and little helpful teaching.

Online reviews stress workload and writing volume, while and lack of support.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Participation matters appears in multiple tags, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Both formats mention participation through tags, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students almost unanimously warn against taking her because , and lack of support.

Online and in-person evidence are both strongly negative, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

3/100

Reviews repeatedly call her a and describe zeros, failing, impossible essays, and .

Format shift

Online reviews include AI-related zeros and impossible essays, while , and .

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students report lots of reading, lots of writing, many papers, weekly essays, and .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly emphasize excessive homework and essays, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Most students describe poor teaching, lack of clarity, lack of help, and .

Format shift

Online and one online student noting the course helped them write better despite harshness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The course appears , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are extremely negative, with and and lack of help.

Main concern

Students report failing, dropping, and not receiving useful support or clarity.

What students said

“ ”
ENGWR
“I never received clarity on her standards or what specifically needed improvement, which made it challenging to adjust my work.”
ENGWR

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews describe harsh grading, heavy writing, AI accusations, and very negative teaching experiences.

Main concern

Students report , and AI accusations.

What students said

“I got accused of ai with and was given a 0.”
ENGWR
“She and an .”
ENGWR

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring method, open-book rule, webcam .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quizzes, midterms, finals, or exam rules.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you wanna get accused of ai and fail”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

3/100

“I got accused of ai with and was given a 0.”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“She and an .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

3/100

“ ”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • I got accused of ai with and was given a 0.
  • It's not possible to receive an a in essays because she says nothing can be perfect.
  • I never received clarity on her standards or what specifically needed improvement

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • if you're not the type to read and write a lot.
  • She and an .
  • So many papers

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • a pathetic excuse for a teacher
  • has absolutely no idea on how to teach

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent reviews are highly consistent across formats, with , and AI accusations.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGWR7 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1