AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Virginia Carr

CIS124 · EXCELCIS · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if and do not need fast instructor replies.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive OnlineBook Work DumpHelpful In PersonSelf Directed ExcelMixed Support
  • Only two reviews and they sharply disagree on support quality.
  • The negative review describes dumped study plans with almost no instructor contact.
  • The milder review says she helped with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Content is called easy and book-driven, so grades are not the hard part if you complete the work alone.

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Excel material itself is treated as manageable, though formulas can confuse without help.

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

two reviews.

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Unresponsiveness and lack of teaching materials outweigh the .

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; complaints focus on absence of .

Format shift

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Workload

Light

72/100

Work is book exercises and .

Format shift

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

One student got formula help, but the other says she gave only a study plan and never responded.

Format shift

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears to be book work and quizzes rather than instructor-led exams.

Format shift

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and one nearly absent instructor with book-only work.

Main concern

Support can disappear, leaving only book work and quizzes.

What students said

“I met with her 3 times because some of the and she always helped me out.”
EXCELCIS
“she was never online! So if a student had a .”
CIS124

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention book work and quizzes but .

Book workQuizzesNo proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-labeled reviews mention book work and .

Book-based workQuizzes
“Just work from the book and quizzes.”
CIS124

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she was never online! So if a student had a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews with conflicting support stories. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Support

34/100

“She just literally gave us the study plan and all the work for the whole semester.”

🅰️ Course Ease

76/100

“the class is easy BUT she was never online!”

👎 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“No lesson plans or study guides or anything! Just work from the book and quizzes.”

💡 In-Person Help

50/100

“some of the and she always helped me out.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Presence

  • she was never online! So if a student had a .
  • No lesson plans or study guides or anything!
  • she always helped me out.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • the class is easy BUT she was never online!
  • Just work from the book and quizzes.
  • some of the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old, conflicting reviews make the sample too thin for strong confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIS1241 review
EXCELCIS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values