Julie Ewing

ENG218 · ENG101 · ENG103 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 58/100
RMP rating: 3.2/5
Take again: 55.56%
Difficulty: 3.2

The decision

if you want stronger writing and ; skip if you dislike her style or need an easy glide.

Best fit · Effort For RewardContract Grading PolarizingParticipation MattersClear Feedback On PapersPersonality Can Rub WrongWriting Skills Improve

and unclear expectations frustrate some while .
Many report real writing improvement if they put in effort and revise.
and personality or tone can turn students off.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students report As and revisions, but and tough standards mean effort is still required.

Online easy A reports exist (ENG218), while and meet her paper expectations.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Reading load and , but content is surface-level English composition rather than abstract theory.

Online ENG218 felt easy (read and movies); in-person ENG101/103 feel tougher with papers and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and participation matters tags appear often.

; in-person almost always yes mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About half love the writing growth and feedback; others say run away over personality and .

Both formats show split takes; online has one yes and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

High A count but and .

Format shift

; online less detail on strictness.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

So many papers, reading load, and group work keep the load real but not crushing.

Format shift

Online ENG218 called easy; and papers.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Clear assignment planning and and unclear expectations for some.

Format shift

In-person praise for lectures and ; online notes catty emails.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Papers, revisions, participation, and .

Format shift

Neither format clearly describes traditional closed-book exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and writing growth for motivated students, tough personality and .

Main concern

and demeaning comments about prior students.

What students said

“she really challenges you and .”
ENG101

“ like it or may not, I did not.”
ENG103

“Run the other way to another professor”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, but and messy group work for others.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Julie helped me out with the and gave me some advice.”
ENG101

“any time I emailed her with a question she was extremely catty and honestly unpleasant.”
ENG218

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and ; exam policy is not clearly proven.

Paper-Based AssessmentContract GradingRevisions AllowedGroup Assignment

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews center on papers, revisions, and .

Contract GradingPaper RevisionsParticipation

“ and gives you a chance to revise them.”
ENG101

“Not a fan of though.”
ENG103

Online

Online comments focus on homework help and a .

Group AssignmentHomework Heavy

“The and poorly explained”
ENG218

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Professor Ewing's English 101 class can be tough for some, and she really challenges you and .”
Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (2 online, 9 in and writing growth. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝 Writing Growth

70/100

“My writing skills definately improved from taking this class.”

⚖️

45/100

“ like it or may not, I did not.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ improve in their writing and reading.”

⚠️ Personality Risk

40/100

“I was not a fan of her personality but she is a good teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

and great planning of assignments
Amazing lectures
Boring/useless lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

This professor is going to help you improve your writing
If you don't
Easy class; read some things and watch some movies

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

She's a nice person
Julie Rocks!!!
extremely catty and honestly unpleasant

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews spanning 2015-2026 with mixed grades and both formats give a usable but polarized signal.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53

4 out of 53

3 out of 51

2 out of 52

1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1017 reviews

ENG1033 reviews

ENG2181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

A 7

B range

B+ 1

C range

C+ 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 1

Julie Ewing

x x if you want stronger writing and x x x x x x x; skip if you dislike her style or need an easy glide.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Mandatory

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

📝 Writing Growth

⚖️ x x x

👍 Recommendation Split

⚠️ Personality Risk

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

❤️ About Character

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want stronger writing and ; skip if you dislike her style or need an easy glide.

⚖️