AI Rate Professor

English

Daniel Wexelblatt

ENG103 · ENG101 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want to become a better writer and and paper deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives good feedbackLots of writingCaringAccessible outside classSo many papers
  • Most students say he and .
  • Workload is heavy with weekly discussions and long essays, especially in ENG103.
  • Online reviews are strongly positive; and load.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn As, but they say they work for them with and As.

Online students more often report As with fair effort; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard college English with and writing rather than abstract theory, but the volume makes it feel hard.

Online difficulty ratings vary widely; in-person ENG103 comments stress reading and paper volume more.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory in some sections and not required in others, with .

Both online and and not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and writing growth, with a minority warning about workload and .

Online ; in-person is split between glowing and Beware reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and timely, but tags and and nitpicking on commas.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize fair on-time grading; grader.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and a multi-page research paper dominate the load.

Format shift

In-person ENG103 warnings about crushing homework are stronger than most online comments.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students , and improved writing skill, with a few clarity and materials complaints.

Format shift

Online teaching praise is stronger and more .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and homework with little mention of high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and discussions rather than proctored exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and lighter homework to harsh warnings about crushing paper load and uneven grading.

Main concern

Some students report and materials that feel randomly selected.

What students said

“ .”
ENG103
“ as a teacher if you are looking for someone knowledgeable and humorous to learn from.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ENG103 students , and clear structure with manageable weekly discussions plus a .

Main concern

and lots of writing can feel endless if you fall behind.

What students said

“Prof. Wex rocks!”
ENG103
“I struggled with his class, but Wexelblatt truly cares about his students and will make you a better writer.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on papers and students find manageable if they keep up.

Writing-focused assessmentResearch paper in stagesDiscussion postsNo clear proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reading rather than exam format; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policies.

Frequent essaysHeavy reading
“ of expertise in helping each student.”
ENG103

Online

Online reviews describe weekly discussions, writing assignments, and a .

Weekly discussionsResearch paperWriting assignments
“There is an 8 to 10 page paper due at the end of the class, but he leads up to it gently.”
ENG103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I struggled with his class, but Wexelblatt truly cares about his students and will make you a better writer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Writing Growth

85/100

“I'm glad I did because I noticed my writing improve with every assignment.”

📚

32/100

“He is obsessed with one paper each week.”

💬

88/100

“ and ”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“Wish I had him for my ENG101 class as well!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • creative lectures that were really information and fun
  • Wexelblatt truly cares about his students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I'm a good writer but I definitely had to work for my A
  • Does grade fairly and usually on time

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of reading and lots of writing
  • , so it feels like the
  • You

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed reviews from 2016-2025 across online and and writing load despite some recent negative outliers.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1038 reviews
ENG1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3