AI Rate Professor

History

Scott Sault

HIS112 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if and want an engaging history lecture, not an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHilariousInconsistent GradingGet Ready to ReadParticipation Matters
  • Online review paints him as a .
  • In-person students found him funny, engaging, and refreshing for history.
  • Experience and grades swing hard by format and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and rule-shifting, so even strong students may land a B rather than an easy A.

Online evidence is harsh; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty runs high online and moderate in person, with .

Online difficulty rated 5; in-person rated 3.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Both reviews report attendance as mandatory.

Mandatory in both online and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

One glowing in-person review and one scathing online review leave recommendation split.

; online student did not recommend.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; students say he grades beyond the stated paper rules.

Format shift

Harshness is clearest in the online review.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Reading and participation matter, but comments do not describe crushing weekly volume.

Format shift

Both formats mention reading and engagement rather than endless busywork.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

In-person students call him hilarious and enriching; online students call grading poor and unfair.

Format shift

In-person teaching praised; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments center on paper .

Format shift

Evidence is paper-focused, especially online.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person HIS112 felt enriching, funny, and .

Main concern

and participation.

What students said

“ . The material was enriching and he provided numerous opportunities to share what we found interesting.”
HIS112

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online HIS112 felt harsh and unpredictable, with .

Main concern

and straight-A students still struggle.

What students said

“he will grade you on. he expect wayyy more then what HE assigns. Straight A student struggle ”
HIS112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format; .

Paper GradingParticipation

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation, not exam policy.

ParticipationReading
“he provided numerous opportunities to share what we found interesting”
HIS112

Online

Online review focuses on paper grading adding .

Paper GradingUnstated Criteria
“will write a whole thing on and easy to follow but then when he grades he add extra things”
HIS112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he expect wayyy more then what HE assigns. Straight A student struggle ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews spanning online and in-person HIS112. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

22/100

“will write a whole thing on and easy to follow but then when he grades he add extra things that he did not write he will grade you on”

🎭 Classroom Energy

85/100

“ . The material was enriching”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“History classes can sometimes be ultra dry. Not this one.”

Theme 1

📝

  • Straight A student struggle
  • he expect wayyy more then what HE assigns

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • material was enriching
  • History classes can sometimes be ultra dry. Not this one.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two polar opposite reviews across two years and formats, so confidence is limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIS1122 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values