AI Rate Professor

English

Mary Cook

ENG217 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take Mary Cook if and real writing growth and can handle a and paper load.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives Good FeedbackCaringGet Ready to ReadSo Many PapersHands-On Online
  • and active discussion presence.
  • and papers, and one online student found it overwhelming.
  • if you put in steady effort and want strong literature mentoring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

As long as you stay on top of readings and , but the work is not minimal.

Online reviews show both A outcomes and one D under heavy load; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Literature content is manageable with effort, but volume of reading and writing keeps challenge real.

Online difficulty ranges from moderate to very hard; in-person felt moderate.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, so flexibility is inconsistent.

Online evidence is mixed; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and passion despite workload complaints.

Stronger recommendation online among engaged students; one negative online outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and supportive, but grades still track effort and .

Format shift

Online has both high grades and one D; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated tags and comments about many papers, reading, and high assignment volume.

Format shift

Workload complaints are strongest in online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and active discussion presence dominate the reviews.

Format shift

Online and in-person both praise teaching; one online student felt lost.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Papers, discussions, and frequent submissions drive the .

Format shift

Online comments emphasize papers and discussions; and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person student found her down to earth, discussion-oriented, and .

Main concern

Lots of reading and participation expectations.

What students said

“Mary was an amazing instructor who is extremely down to Earth. She takes pride in her profession and ”
ENG217

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly love her presence and feedback, but one found the and confusing.

Main concern

High paper and management.

What students said

“ and clearly is passionate about literature”
ENG217
“Probably one of the class”
ENG217
“She's so present and so active within the ”
ENG217

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and .

Discussion HeavyPaper BasedFrequent Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group projects rather than exam policy.

Heavy ReadingParticipationGroup Projects
“Requires a lot of reading but if you stay on top of the material you really can't go wrong”
ENG217

Online

Online reviews center on heavy assignments, discussions, and .

Many AssignmentsDiscussion PostsFeedback Heavy
“There was a lot of work in all of her literature classes”
ENG217
“ and ”
ENG217

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the most hands-on, communicative, and friendly instructor that I have had out of the multiple colleges that I've ever attended.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (4 online, 1 in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

88/100

“ and clearly is passionate about literature”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Probably one of the class”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“So long as you put in the effort, she is there to help you succeed!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's so present and so active within the discussions
  • Mary was an amazing instructor who is extremely down to Earth
  • I loved that she offers insight & joins in on class discussions

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • There was a lot of work in all of her literature classes
  • Get ready to read
  • So many papers

Theme 3

⚠️ About Frustration

  • Don’t feel like I’m learning anything just money down the drain
  • Extremely limited meet hours very hard to get ahold of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five fairly detailed reviews with but not huge sample.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG2175 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values