AI Rate Professor

English

Delphine Boswell

ENG101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if possible; and teaching .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear gradingMixed English 101Style mismatchAssignment confusion
  • Reviews for ENG101 are mixed and lean negative overall.
  • One student says unassigned work still counted and grades felt unfair.
  • A minority report the class is fine if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even a student who usually earns As and did reported ending with a .

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings cluster around moderate and comments do not describe advanced content.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available reviews.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Two of three .

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report unfair grade impact from unassigned work and unexpected B grades.

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload centers on papers and timely completion rather than an overwhelming volume of tasks.

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Quality averages low, with complaints about style and only one moderately positive review.

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Comments focus on papers and .

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ENG101 feedback is mixed, with and teaching style outweighing one positive work-on-time note.

Main concern

Unclear assignment tracking and .

What students said

“ but still added them to her overall grade.”
ENG101
“Good class. Do all the work on time, and get help if you need to on the papers.”
ENG101
“do no like her stlye”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One review mentions limited blue book use, but .

PapersBlue Book Light Use

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention papers and limited blue .

PapersBlue Book Light Use
“The blue book is not used too much, more time used on the short stories book.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but still added them to her overall grade. I have never gotten anything other than an A in English classes, I even did and still got a B”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 In , and paper-focused work. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

22/100

“ but still added them to her overall grade.”

🎯 Teaching Reception

35/100

“do no like her stlye”

📝 Work Path

55/100

“Do all the work on time, and get help if you need to on the papers.”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • still added them to her overall grade
  • even did and still got a B

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Class Experience

  • Good class. Do all the work on time
  • do no like her stlye

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three same-semester ENG101 reviews provide some consistency but limited breadth and sparse grade data.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values