AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Sikora

MATH123A · MATH125 · MATH123B · MATH265 · MAT125 · MATH227 · MATH260 · H0473 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
64.71%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Solid pick for if you do the homework and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear When PresentExam HeavySelf-Teach OnlineLots of HomeworkStraightforward Tests
  • , and an easy path if you keep up.
  • Online sections rely on platforms and .
  • Grades lean on exams, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

74/100

Many A and A+ reports show an A is realistic if .

Online As often come from grinding platform HW; in-person As come from notes, cheat sheets, and lecture examples.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Material is standard community-college math but harder by pace and .

Online feels harder without teaching; in-person feels more manageable for attentive students.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

, but and participation tags mean showing up still matters for success.

; in-person reviews more often stress not skipping.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

About two-thirds would take again, with strongest praise for and workable grades when effort is real.

In-person recommendations are warmer; online recommendations .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

, but limited partial credit and exam-heavy scales.

Format shift

; in-person fairness depends more on exam performance.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Lots of , though some say homework is only lightly checked.

Format shift

Online HW volume is heavier; in-person HW is frequent but sometimes lightly graded.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and helpful when asked, though a sizable minority say lectures are rushed or thin.

Format shift

Teaching quality scores much higher in person than online.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and often only around 10 percent.

Format shift

; online also recycles HW questions onto tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is widely seen as , and fair if , and ask questions.

Main concern

Fast lectures and lots of partial credit.

What students said

“ statistics !”
MATH227
“he DOES NOT OVER COMPLICATE the material! easy A!”
MATH260
“You are on your own in his class. You have to learn on your own.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online is passable for and recycled questions, but students say he barely teaches.

Main concern

You mostly teach yourself and need a tutor or .

What students said

“There is no actual teaching done by this professor.”
MATH227
“Basically you teach your self tho.”
MATH227
“he personally doesn't teach anything.”
MATH260

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and lectures closely, so they are fair if you practice, but high stakes overall.

Exam heavyHomework-like test questionsCheat sheet sometimes allowedDrop lowest exam reported

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

examples, and some sections allow a cheat sheet.

Straightforward testsCheat sheet allowedDrop lowest exam
“Lets you use a cheat sheet for the tests so theres no reason for you not to pass his class.”
MATH227
“ .”
H0473

Online

, so grinding attempts can reveal almost every test item.

Recycled HW questionsFrequent examsSelf-taught prep
“questions are recycled and seen on both the exams and final.”
MATH227
“Exam and homework except with different numbers.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he DOES NOT OVER COMPLICATE the material! easy A!wish he was at elco!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, highlighting . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

70/100

“Honestly the ! if you need help he will help you”

👍

66/100

“DEFINETLY reccomend.”

🧠

45/100

“The program teaches you, not the professor. You learn yourself.”

📝

78/100

“Your grade is based on how you do on the tests and final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very straightforward.
  • he DOES NOT OVER COMPLICATE the material!
  • He walks out so quick after class is done.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A!
  • if you do the HW, pay attention in class, and ask questions then youll be fine.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Learning

  • all lecture material is covered by Larry Green on yt.
  • Basically you teach your self tho.
  • he personally doesn't teach anything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

48 detailed reviews across many terms and and teaching-split themes.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 510
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH22728 reviews
MATH2605 reviews
MATH123B4 reviews
MATH1254 reviews
H04732 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MAT1252 reviews
1251 review
MATH123A1 review
MATH2651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 9 · A 12

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 5

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1