AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

William Ohm

MATH240 · MATH123B · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

; , and success usually requires already knowing the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderLecture HeavyVague AnswersHearing IssuesTest Heavy
  • Students describe lectures as , and board-writing with .
  • and .
  • Nearly all .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Tough grading, test-heavy design, and students.

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call the material hard and say the pace and vague lectures make trigonometry and related math feel punishing.

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most students report and skipping hurts your chance to pass.

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and repeated run-away warnings dominate the reviews.

; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tags and and F outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Random multi-page packets, lots of homework, and test-heavy load add up quickly.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say he cannot hear well, answers vaguely, and mostly writes silently on the board.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly call the class test heavy with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chalk-board lectures feel vague and hard to follow, with , and .

Main concern

, and poor hearing make the class nearly unworkable without prior mastery.

What students said

“ .”
MATH240
“If you dont already know the material before hand, good luck getting a B.”
MATH240
“is super vague with the lecture materials!”
MATH123B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and feel strict because teaching support is weak and .

Test HeavyIn-Person ExamsTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize test-heavy grading with .

Test HeavyTough GraderIn-Person Class
“ , So ”
MATH240
“If you dont already know the material before hand, good luck getting a B.”
MATH240

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2019-2024, highlighting teaching clarity and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“He cant hear, wear , doesn't answer your question clearly, gives a random packet every time you come to class”

📉 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“Better off finding a better professor.”

⚖️

15/100

“If you dont already know the material before hand, good luck getting a B.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • writes and writes on the board and doesn't say anything
  • speaks softly and with a monotone
  • Doesn't answer questions clearly

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test heavy
  • good luck getting a B

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • his hearing is pretty bad
  • so you don't know your grade
  • Horrible

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews from 2019-2024 are highly consistent, but the sample is still small.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH2404 reviews
MATH123B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values