AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

J. Muncherian

MATH240 · MATH123A · TRIG240 · MATH112 · 240TRIG · MATH105 · MATH115 · MATH123 · MATHA1624 · TRIGONOMETRY · MATH227 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him only if and ; lectures are hit or miss.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStudy guide aligned testsSelf-teach heavyLecture mistakesLots of homeworkFormula sheets sometimes
  • some praise care and study-guide alignment, others say lectures fail.
  • Tests often track homework or study guides, but .
  • Self-directed students fare better than those needing hand-holding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Study guides and , but and self-teaching still demand real effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Content difficulty is middle-of-road math, with some sections feeling fast and test-heavy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

while others say it was not required.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About half the tone is positive for care and structure, half warns against weak teaching clarity.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Homework graded by effort, formula or cheat sheets appear, and , but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Some call lectures amazing and patient; many say mistakes, speed, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

One review notes homework only 5% with about 75% on tests; tests dominate elsewhere too.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

caring and study-guide friendly for .

Main concern

Lecture clarity and board work can force heavy self-teaching.

What students said

“ and he allows formula sheets.”
MATH227
“ , and it's made even worse by the fact that he is making mistakes constantly.”
MATH123A
“you basically have to teach yourself from the book. NOT EASY!”
0500

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often aligned to study guides or and heavy grade weight.

Study-guide aligned examsFormula or cheat sheets sometimesNo calculators or notes in some classesTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

/no-notes, usually tied to homework or study guides.

Formula sheetsStudy guidesNo calculators or notesDrops lowest test
“ and he allows formula sheets.”
MATH227
“No calculators or . NO CHEATING.”
MATH115
“he allows a cheat sheet for tests.”
MATH240

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he does not know how to teach. If you are going to be taking his class expect alot of mistakes in his lectures and massive amount of homework.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

50/100

“He's a nice guy and he's a ... If you're looking for him to hold your hand, it won't happen.”

📘

40/100

“you basically have to teach yourself from the book. NOT EASY!”

📝

65/100

“ and he allows formula sheets.”

📚

34/100

“expect alot of mistakes in his lectures and massive amount of homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • making mistakes constantly
  • lectures aren't very useful, but the book is

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you do the
  • Test heavy

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • truly does want everyone to understand
  • Professor M. has a very big heart

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across many years show a stable split between praise and .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1124 reviews
MATH2404 reviews
MATH123A2 reviews
05001 review
240TRIG1 review
Show 7 more courses
MATH1051 review
MATH1151 review
MATH1231 review
MATH2271 review
MATHA16241 review
TRIG2401 review
TRIGONOMETRY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4