AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

N. Noguera

MATH112 · MATH215 · MATH234 · 123A · MATH227 · MATH270 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Consider her for an easy online pass only if you do not need strong lecture clarity; avoid if accent or disorganization will block your learning.

Best fit · Easy A HunterHeavy accentDisorganizedEasy online passTest heavyTough grader
  • Accent and organization issues are the most common complaints.
  • Online or light sections can be an easy A with limited learning.
  • In-person stats and calculus experiences are mixed, with and test-focused.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students report easy As and low failure risk when they attend or complete work, especially online.

Online reviews strongly signal easy pass; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Average difficulty is low-to-moderate; content is often called manageable if you follow examples.

Online MATH270 felt very easy; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and others optional, with no single consistent policy.

Online MATH270 attendance no; other online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; recommendation hinges on whether you need clarity or just a grade.

Online has both yes and no; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some call her a and note trick questions, while others say attending and studying makes failing hard.

Format shift

and in person; easy-pass language is stronger online.

Workload

Light

72/100

tests carrying more weight than daily grind.

Format shift

Online summer section called workload very manageable; .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

some say she knows her stuff and , and unresponsive.

Format shift

; in-person accent and organization dominate criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests, reasonable test time online, and group work affecting finals.

Format shift

; but weak review keys.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews split between great teacher praise and , and trick exams.

Main concern

Accent clarity and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH112
“Dr.Noguera was a good teacher, I took her for Stats we couldn't finish the curriculum, but overall a good teacher.”
MATH227
“She is very hard .”
123A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students report manageable workload and easy As, but also weak learning, long Zoom lectures, and .

Main concern

You .

What students said

“it's honestly too easy and you don't learn as much as you should.”
MATH270
“If u want and but you wont learn and .”
MATH215
“her zoom lectures are very long and you do need to pay attention and .”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not prove proctoring software, but some report trick questions and .

Timed testsTrick questions reportedGroup classwork impact

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

announced material and occasional trick questions.

TestsTrick questionsGroup work affects grade
“tested us on material different than what she told us would be tested”
MATH112
“Uses Trick questions on exams that might possibly frustrate you she never taught this method.”
MATH112

Online

Online students note reasonable test time and confusion on HW and .

Reasonable test timeQuizzesUnclear feedback
“she gives a very reasonable amount of .”
MATH270
“a lot of confusion on hw and .”
MATH215

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you wish to learn the material for future use.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting accent, easy-pass tradeoffs, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🗣️ Accent Barrier

40/100

“She is very hard .”

🎯 Easy Online Grade

80/100

“it's honestly too easy and you don't learn as much as you should.”

📋 Organization Issues

35/100

“She was incredibly disorganized, tested us on material different than what she told us would be tested and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • Broken English and accent left me with headaches.
  • Lectures are not easy to understand
  • She knows her stuff and wants to make sure you know it too.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you attend class and pay attention to the examples there is no way to fail
  • If u want and but you wont learn
  • My recommendation is just to study a little more than average!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Structure

  • All classwork is done in groups.
  • her zoom lectures are very long

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews from 2011-2026 show persistent accent concerns and a , but sample is modest and detail varies.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1123 reviews
MATH2152 reviews
MATH2272 reviews
123A1 review
MATH2341 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH2701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2