AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bao Nyugen

MATH266 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and only need a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest HeavyUnresponsive EmailsHarsh High-Stakes TestsLow SupportLearn Little
  • Only two recent reviews and both rate teaching quality very low.
  • Extremely test-heavy grading with unforgiving 5-question exams and weak support.
  • One student still got an A online but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Content can be simple, but the way to an A.

Online student got an A ; in-person felt neglected.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

One student says content is easy enough; the and lack of support, not concept density.

Both formats describe standard calculus content with harsh assessment.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

as not mandatory.

and in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

In-person student would never recommend; .

; online is a reluctant grade-only yes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

meaningful curve despite low class averages.

Format shift

Harshness appears in both the online and in-person MATH266 notes.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

; the load is concentrated in infrequent but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Students report ignored emails, lazy methods, and .

Format shift

In-person felt neglected; online called methods lazy even while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

high-stakes tests with limited other components.

Format shift

Test-heavy tags and comments appear in both formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

No email replies, high fail rates, neglected students, and .

Main concern

Felt ignored all semester with no curve despite averages under 60%.

What students said

“Never answered a . Made our FIRST quiz due the same weekend of the final.”
MATH266

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Clear but lazy lectures; grade .

Main concern

; poor for deep calculus learning.

What students said

“Incredibly test heavy. Tests have 5 questions on them so if A.”
MATH266

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are few, short, and unforgiving, so small mistakes tank the grade.

Test HeavyFew Questions Per ExamHigh StakesExtra Credit Sparse

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes and no help on high fail rates.

Test HeavyPoorly Timed QuizzesNo Curve
“Made our FIRST quiz due the same weekend of the final. Averages were usually less than 60% but he never addressed the high fail rate/proposed a .”
MATH266

Online

Online MATH266 uses few high-stakes tests with only five questions each.

Test Heavy5-Question TestsGraded by Few ThingsExtra Credit
“Incredibly test heavy. Tests have 5 questions on them so if A.”
MATH266

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting neglect, test severity, and weak learning value. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Support

20/100

“I, among others in the class, felt neglected and ignored through the duration of the semester.”

🧪 Test-Heavy Risk

28/100

“Incredibly test heavy. Tests have 5 questions on them so if A.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“If you just want an A , but if you actually need to understand calc don't.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • Never answered a .
  • felt neglected and ignored through the duration of the semester.

Theme 2

📈

  • .
  • Averages were usually less than 60% but he never addressed the high fail rate
  • Content is easy enough, just never make a mistake.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 recent reviews, both negative on teaching quality, so but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2662 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values