AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Maritza Jimenez-Zeljak

MATH123A · MATHA · MATH125 · MATH123 · MATH115 · MATH215 · MATH123B · MATH0513 · STEMCOHORT · MATH110 · 123A · CALCU0528 · MATH265 · MATH123C · MATH260 · 84 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
21.05%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material well and choice.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyConfusing lecturesMandatory attendanceHeavy homework
  • Majority of , and leave students teaching themselves via YouTube.
  • ; homework is heavy but counts little; and mark-downs are common.
  • missing class or tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Tests are extremely hard, homework barely counts, and mastery.

Both online and and ; online adds timed copy-and-show-work pressure.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

, and test-heavy load make the content feel much harder than peers describe elsewhere.

In-person dominates the sample; online students echo the same fast, vague teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Skip class and you will not pass—missing lectures or drops.

Mandatory attendance is stressed in both formats; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students urge others to run; .

A minority of ; online and higher-level courses are overwhelmingly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

; students report marked-down correct work and .

Format shift

and in-person; few leniency mentions.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Lots of homework, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats report heavy HW and test load; online adds strict time limits on exams.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Many say lectures confuse the whole class; a small minority find her thorough and accessible outside class.

Format shift

In-person has more mixed older positives; recent and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Tests and ; but counts little.

Format shift

Test-heavy pattern is consistent online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person majority describe confusing fast , and mandatory attendance.

Main concern

; missing one day can tank the grade and help is often limited.

What students said

“Jimenez was probably the . Her lectures are just god awful and .”
MATH260
“If teacher, I learned more from Youtube then I did her.”
MATH123
“she told me, "she is not here to teach". what?? her poor comments and unwillingness to help”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and drop risk for missed sessions.

Main concern

, and unprofessional communication if tech fails.

What students said

“Save yourself and . She moves through coursework with , and does not compromise at all.”
MATH260
“ lecture and if her wifi doesnt work she will not notify you”
MATH125
“Not good for people with learning disabilities makes work to complicated then needs to be”
MATH115

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes dominate; and showing work under tight limits.

Test HeavyTimed ExamsWeekly QuizzesHard TestsLittle Homework Weight

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses are quiz- and do not prepare them for.

Weekly QuizzesLong TestsTest HeavyPop Quizzes
“There is a and . She does a very poor job preparing you for the test”
MATH260
“The exams are so hard I got 50% on them. There is homework but that barely counts for anything.”
MATH260

Online

Online tests give about 90 minutes with copy-questions and show-work requirements; reviews .

Timed TestsShow WorkLightning Pace
“She gives you one hour and thirty minutes for questions, show work”
MATH260

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (4 online, 46 in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“ . Everyone in ”

⚠️

18/100

“Save yourself and don't take her... if you see her name.”

📝

15/100

“She marks you down really hard. Even if I showed all my work correct and the answer was right she still marked me wrong”

📚

20/100

“I learned more from Youtube then I did her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures make no sense at all.
  • she goes through lectures really fast and
  • HER METHOD OF TEACHING IS COMPLICATED ... NO CLEARITY

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to be a math genius to pass this class.
  • The tests are extremely hard and there's lots of
  • hardest class i have ever taken.

Theme 3

🚪

  • You miss one day of class and your grade is dropped tremendously
  • lecture
  • She doesn't offer any help what so ever.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

84

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with highly consistent negative , and grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 514
3 out of 57
2 out of 518
1 out of 534

Course coverage

MATH123C7 reviews
MATH2607 reviews
MATH1106 reviews
MATH1156 reviews
MATH1235 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH123B5 reviews
05152 reviews
MATH123A2 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
123A1 review
CALCU05281 review
MATH 123C1 review
MATH05131 review
MATH2151 review
MATH2651 review
MATHA1 review
STEMCOHORT1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Rather not say 1