AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dan Ruiz

HA1 · ENG28 · MATH115 · COUN101 · COUNCELING17 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

and only risk a math class if you already have strong alternatives and low expectations for support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpful counselorMissed appointmentsTalks about himselfHarsh with studentsMixed math reviews
  • Most reviews describe unhelpful counseling, skipped appointments, and dismissive interactions.
  • A minority praise him as a trying.
  • ; many students urge finding someone else.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

; incomplete/audit outcomes and unhelpful feedback suggest an A is neither easy nor well supported.

Sparse grade evidence overall; one A- in person and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Average difficulty ratings are high and several comments frame interactions and class expectations as hard rather than introductory.

Both online and claims.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, while counseling/audit contexts report non-mandatory attendance.

Online counseling reviews often non-mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and call him a poor counselor or unhelpful teacher, with only rare positive math notes.

Both online reviews are strongly negative; outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Limited grade data and reports of on math tests.

Format shift

; most reviews give no grade support.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

One online tag cites lots of homework; other reviews focus more .

Format shift

Online ENG28 tags LOTS OF HOMEWORK; in-person comments rarely detail workload size.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is unhelpful, dismissive counseling and weak support, though a couple older math reviews praise clarity and practice.

Format shift

Online reviews are uniformly poor; quality-1 reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention tests and practice in math and general class work, but do not establish a .

Format shift

In-person math mentions practice and tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and classroom temperament, with two older math reviews calling him clear and even great for math-anxious students.

Main concern

Long wait times, missed appointments, dismissive attitude, and .

What students said

“He did not bother to help me and when I emailed him about my problem, he told me to ask a different counselor.”
COUN101
“Mr. Dan is seriously the .”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experiences describe cut-off chats, cancelled appointments labeled as harassment, and a brief not-a-good-teacher note with lots of homework.

Main concern

Unresponsive or dismissive online counseling and weak teaching support.

What students said

“He seemed like he wanted to end the chat the whole time and said ending chat before all of my questions were answered.”
COUN101
“Sorry, not a good teacher.”
ENG28

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is largely undescribed; one math review notes points for trying, but most .

Limited Exam DetailPoints For Trying (Math)No Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person math notes practice-heavy teaching and proctoring proof.

Practice Until UnderstoodPoints For Trying On Tests
“when he grades the .”
MATH115

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not let him dictate you. Stand up for yourself and go to another counselor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (2 online, 8 in-person), highlighting counseling failures and mixed math notes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Low Recommendation

18/100

“ :/, youre better off with any other teacher”

📉 Support Quality

28/100

“He did not bother to help me and when I emailed him about my problem, he told me to ask a different counselor.”

🧮 Rare Math Praise

70/100

“ so clear and he makes us practice,practice,practice until we can understand it.”

Theme 1

🧭 About Counseling Support

  • he skipped my appointment
  • I waited three hours once

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Classroom Personality

  • he talks way too much about himself, and gets annoyed easily
  • kicked out a student just for smiling
  • great class

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews from 2015-2020 provide enough volume, but mix counseling and teaching contexts and include sparse grade detail.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH1155 reviews
COUN1012 reviews
COUNCELING171 review
ENG281 review
HA11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1