AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

B. Tong

MATHC · MATH0491 · MATH123A · STAT227 · STATS227 · MATH123 · MATH123B · TR102 · MATH7069 · MATH137 · MATH227 · MATH123C · MATH125 · STATS265 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless no other section exists; plan to teach yourself with the book and math lab if you enroll.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandSelf-Teach RequiredMath Lab DependentRough DeliveryLenient Curve Sometimes
  • , and skipped steps.
  • Passing , and homework rather than classroom teaching.
  • A minority note weekend help access and a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A few pass with effort and a lenient scale, but many fail or .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Material difficulty is moderate to high and made harder by hard-to-follow lectures.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and sitting front matters because lectures are quiet.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most detailed ; formal complaint language is common despite a .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

Several students say the quality is poor.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and tests matter; workload is standard .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is inability to explain, answer questions, or communicate clearly.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

; some say questions come from book or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math students mostly report poor explanations, frustration with questions, and reliance on the and .

Main concern

Communication barriers and weak lecture clarity force self-teaching.

What students said

“He is BEYOND TERRIBLE. First his accent is thick and he expects you to undetstand.”
MATH227
“He knows the material, but he cant TEACH it!!”
MATH123B
“ . I passed the class with a 63% which was a "C".”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; success tracks book practice and self-study more than lecture clarity.

Book-Based TestsNotes HelpfulMath Lab Support

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

some sections; others report mismatch with homework.

Book-Based TestsNotes HelpfulMath Lab Support
“ his notes.”
MATH227
“The or notes.”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“the only way you pass this class is if you can teach yourself. or .. this teacher does not know how to teach..”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 in-person , and grading notes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🗣️ Communication Barrier

28/100

“ .”

📚

30/100

“the only way you pass this class is if you can teach yourself. or .”

⚖️

62/100

“ . I passed the class with a 63% which was a "C".”

👎

25/100

“Absolutely the ! I was warned by ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He just doesn't speak English. He doesn't answer questions.
  • has on the board and thats his lecture
  • as well as in class during the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to try pretty hard to get a D or F in this class.
  • I failed. I asked questions & got chastised for it.
  • You'll be fine if you do all the homework and extra credits.

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Climate

  • He gets annoyed if you ask a question he is very rude.
  • If you ask questions in class he will make you feel like a dummy
  • Mr. Tong has no interpersonal communication skills.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three in-person reviews over a decade are consistently negative on teaching clarity, with enough detail to trust the pattern despite sparse grade data.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH2275 reviews
MATH123A2 reviews
MATH123B2 reviews
MATH123C2 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
Show 9 more courses
STATS2272 reviews
MATH04911 review
MATH1231 review
MATH1371 review
MATH70691 review
MATHC1 review
STAT2271 review
STATS2651 review
TR1021 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1