AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Koffi Enakoutsa

MATH227 · MATH115 · MATH125 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Only take if you can handle , and ; otherwise pick another instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingHeavy HomeworkTough GraderFast LecturesAccessible Outside Class
  • Reviews split hard between passion/accessibility and .
  • and skipping makes passing difficult.
  • Online MATH227 feedback is strongly negative versus mixed in-person MATH125 experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and lots of , and at least one student reported a D.

Online evidence is one harsh review; and heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Average difficulty is high; several students say he goes fast and .

Both formats report hard content; one in-person student called the class easy and organized.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

and most in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

fans like his passion and help, and .

In-person opinions split; the single .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and low quality ratings from failing or .

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of and negative reviews.

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Quality averages 2.5 with equal praise for passion and accessibility versus criticism of and pace.

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed; the online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework, group projects, and and exams.

Format shift

In-person comments mention , and tests; online stresses few .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH125/115 is split: some praise passion, opportunities to pass, and help outside class; others cite , and .

Main concern

Inconsistent clarity and .

What students said

“Give a lot of opportunities to pass the class. You can tell from his lectures that he has a lot of passion for math.”
MATH125
“Not taking a class with this professor ever again. His notes are all over the place! Sloppy handwriting which makes it hard to understand.”
MATH125
“Professor Kofi really cares about his students. He progresses slowly so we can understand.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One strongly negative online MATH227 review , and a miserable class experience.

Main concern

Heavy workload and reportedly unhelpful or frustrating online instruction.

What students said

“This is the to have to see this professor again he is literally made my life miserable he gives tons of homework”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews stress tests and but do not clearly describe open-book or proctored formats.

Test HeavyGroup ProjectsLots of Homework

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyGroup ProjectsLots of Homework
“ and gives A TON of homework! Made it so hard to try to understand the material.”
MATH125

Online

Online comments do not clearly describe exam proctoring or open-book policy; and .

Lots of HomeworkTough GraderGraded by Few Things
“he gives tons of homework and I never want it to happen again”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not taking a class with this professor ever again. His notes are all over the place! Sloppy handwriting which makes it hard to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (1 online, 5 in person), highlighting split teaching quality and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Clarity

40/100

“Does not know how to teach the material in a way where its understandable.”

📚

22/100

“Gives too much homework, goes really fast expects everyone to know what he is teaching.”

❤️ Passion and Access

70/100

“You can tell from his lectures that he has a lot of passion for math.”

👍

48/100

“Sweet teacher. He loves and is good at what he does. Class is very easy and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he has a lot of passion for math
  • His notes are all over the place
  • He progresses slowly so we can understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and gives A TON of homework
  • Give a lot of opportunities to pass the class

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • gives tons of homework
  • purposely feed this misinformation and then gets upset with us

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed but older reviews (2016-2018) with mixed opinions give moderate confidence, limited by small sample and one online review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1254 reviews
MATH1151 review
MATH2271 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2