AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Azzam Shihabi

MATHB1234 · WTR08 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Strong pick for in-person lower-level math; think twice for online ODE based on the recent negative review.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCrystal-clear explanationsFlexible deadlinesExtra credit before testsIn-person math gemUneven online lectures
  • , and highly flexible with algebra-level math.
  • One recent online ODE review crashes to 1/5 for slow, low-energy lectures and .
  • , while in-person students highlight and deadline flexibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Flexible , and a documented A suggest strong grades are reachable with steady work.

Online student earned an A despite poor lectures; and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is presented as , though online ODE still felt like real work.

; the online ODE review feels more demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

The , and other comments stress overall flexibility.

; in-person policy is not detailed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but the recent online ODE review would not recommend him.

In-person reviews are glowing; the single online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and flexible turn-ins help buffer grades.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in older in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Tags and the online review mention lots of homework, so the load is not featherlight.

Format shift

review.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

In-person teaching is praised as clear and caring, but online lectures were called slow and low energy.

Format shift

In-person quality scores are 5s; the online review is a 1.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person algebra-level students praise clear explanations, flexibility, , and call him the .

Main concern

Evidence is old and partly duplicated, so .

What students said

“Clear and precis with explaining algebra. Very flexible with turning in work. Gives questions before each test.”
MATHB1234
“He is the sweetest nice+++ Clear+++ Flexible+++ The Math!”
WTR08

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One recent online ODE student got an A but slammed slow, low-enthusiasm lectures and .

Main concern

Online lecture quality and if the grade is still attainable.

What students said

“slow lectures with extremely low enthusiasm. and always missing information.”
MATHB1234

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly prove proctoring style.

Extra credit before testsHomework heavyNo proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; no closed-book or proctoring details are given.

Extra credit before tests
“Gives questions before each test. Highly reccomended.”
MATHB1234

Online

Online comments focus on lecture quality and .

Lots of homeworkLecture heavy
“ ”
MATHB1234

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the sweetest nice+++ Clear+++ Flexible+++ The Math!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in person), contrasting older in-person praise with one recent online ODE critique. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 In-Person Teaching

90/100

“ if you were mute and couldnt talk you would never have to ask anything”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“ ”

🎁 Buffer

80/100

“Gives questions before each test. Highly reccomended.”

📚

48/100

“slow lectures with extremely low enthusiasm. and always missing information.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Clear and precis with explaining algebra.
  • if you were mute and couldnt talk
  • slow lectures with extremely low enthusiasm.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very flexible with turning in work.
  • Gives questions before each test.
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

🖥️ About Online vs In Person

  • His first class i took was nice and smooth, but I took him again and he went from a 5/5 to a 1/5.
  • The Math!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, one recent online outlier, two near-duplicate 2008 comments, and limited grade data lower confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATHB12342 reviews
WTR082 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values