AI Rate Professor

English

Kalunda-Rae Iwamizu

ENGLISH101 · ELANG145 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENG145 · 8293ENG · 106 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
4.72%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

; student reports of hostility and poor teaching are extensive and consistent.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRepeated racism allegationsUnprofessionalTough graderSo many papersDo not take
  • Nearly all .
  • Many students allege racist treatment of Latino and Mexican students.
  • Teaching is called unprofessional, harsh, and paper-heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and students still report high grades.

Both online and and heavy paper loads.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and many papers make the class feel difficult beyond normal English work.

Difficulty complaints appear in both formats with similar intensity.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory, with limited evidence of flexible policy.

as mandatory; online is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

, and comments repeatedly tell students never to enroll.

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and failing or low grades dominate despite some reported As.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly cite lots of , and so many papers.

Format shift

Paper and and in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe unprofessional, hostile, and ineffective teaching far more than any strength.

Format shift

Teaching quality is rated as disastrous in both formats.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

So many papers, homework, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews flood with racism , and urgent do-not-take warnings.

Main concern

Classroom hostility and alleged racial targeting dominate student reports.

What students said

“WHY DOES SHE HAVE A JOB???? SHE IS A STRAIGHT UP 100% RACIST”
ENG145
“Had no choice had to take the class n unfortunately for me I got this teacher.”
ENGL101
“ . She should not be teaching at all.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are almost uniformly hostile, citing racism, laziness, poor communication, and .

Main concern

Students report racist treatment and minimal real teaching effort.

What students said

“Miss Iwamizu came off as lazy, to me, throughout the class.”
ELANG145
“Racist comments”
ENG101
“Racist against Mexicans. Refuses to comply with authority.”
ENGLISH101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention papers and occasional tests or pop quizzes, but and inconsistent.

Test heavy tagsSo many papersPop quizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers more than proctoring rules.

Test heavySo many papersLecture heavy
“ ”
ELANG145
“ ”
ENG145

Online

Online comments rarely describe exam logistics and , and conduct.

Paper-heavyLimited exam detail
“Racist comments”
ENG101
“Poor communicator”
ELANG145

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She should not be teaching at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting consistent avoidance, conduct, and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

5/100

“ ”

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Teacher had zero ability to convoy material”

⚠️ Hostile Classroom

8/100

“This woman is a racist pos and you can really feel it in the classroom.”

📝

22/100

“Lots of homework, So many papers”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Conduct

  • Racist and there's video evidence
  • Made me feel awful because I was a different skin color to her
  • Should never be allowed in a classroom.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I think the phrase "phone it in" most accurately describes her efforts to teach us.
  • Her teaching style is shrill and erratic
  • Poor guidance and lack of interest in the information she was teaching.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

106

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed and highly consistent negative reviews across years and formats create very high confidence in the overall warning.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 5100

Course coverage

ELANG14515 reviews
ENG10113 reviews
ENG1457 reviews
8293ENG6 reviews
ENGLISH1015 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1014 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 4 · A 8 · A- 7

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 1 · D- 1

F

5

F 5

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 8