AI Rate Professor

English

Stephanie Arms

ENG145 · ENG23282 · ENGHLISH130 · ENG101 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
69.23%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider her mainly for in-person ENG101 if you write consistently; online sections and communication complaints.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderSo many papersGives good feedbackGet ready to readMixed communication
  • In-person students often praise her as , and inspiring with .
  • Online students frequently report harsh grading, slow or , and disorganization.
  • , and discussions; outcomes depend heavily on format and self-advocacy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

and F grades, and harsh online scoring mean an A usually requires strong writing and persistence.

In-person students more often report easy-if-consistent paths; online students more often report harsh or .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard English composition with and .

Some online winter sections feel overloaded; several in-person students call the material simple if they keep up.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, while some hybrid or online setups feel optional because she may not always appear.

In-person often mandatory; online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About two-thirds would take her again, but .

In-person recommendations are much warmer than online recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Multiple tough-grader reports, late grading, and grade disputes, especially online, outweigh the easy-grader comments.

Format shift

; online grading is frequently called harsh or unfair.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Repeated tags for lots of homework, so many papers, weekly discussions, and substantial reading.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-heavy; online compressed terms feel especially loaded.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Strong in-person teaching praise is undercut , and disorganization.

Format shift

and organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and occasional group projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are writing-centered; one older online review also mentions pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and passable if you stay on top of essays and attendance.

Main concern

, and occasional no-shows or late starts in some terms.

What students said

“ and is a kind and patient person. The class is very easy if you stay on top of the work”
ENG101
“Really caring professor by far my favorite at LASW! .”
ENG101
“She was late for every single class. and she never ever responded to emails.”
ENG145

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experience is polarized and often negative: unclear instructions, delayed grading, ignored emails, AI accusations, and tough scoring.

Main concern

Harsh or and .

What students said

“ if you can. The workload isn't heavy, but the .”
ENG101
“ ... Work graded after course. AVOID”
ENG101
“Loaded a ton of assignments in the class and didn't grade at all.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly papers and discussions; .

Essay-heavyReading responsesGroup projectPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group work with limited exam logistics described.

Three essaysGroup projectReading-based essays
“She only gives 3 essays during the whole semester, and a !”
ENG101
“ ”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews focus on multiple papers, discussions, and .

Multiple papersWeekly discussionsDelayed grading
“There was three papers due throughout the semester, one of them being the final.”
ENG101
“Loaded a ton of assignments in the class and didn't grade at all.”
ENG101
“too strict”
ENG23282

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can. The workload isn't heavy, but the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews with a . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

54/100

“prof Arms is comported, knows her job, encouraging, approachable, willing to help guide you with your assignments.”

⚠️ Online Risk

28/100

“She does not respond ... Work graded after course. AVOID”

📝 Paper Load

36/100

“ and R&B, which made the material engaging while still requiring extensive writing and research.”

👍 In-Person Upside

78/100

“Really caring professor by far my favorite at LASW! . :)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is very calm, ready to teach, very good listener
  • Her teaching style is engaging and supportive
  • She is so nice, and ! !!

Theme 2

📧 About Communication

  • Hard to reach outside of class. Doesn't answer emails.
  • does not reply to her emails... and
  • and she never ever responded to emails.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the
  • She's an .
  • Lit as if you want to pass do the work and you good.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six recent and older reviews with a and detailed complaints provide strong, consistent evidence.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG10121 reviews
ENG1452 reviews
Enghlish1302 reviews
ENG232821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1