AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lernik Saakian

TRIG240 · TRIG1704 · ALG115 · MTH125 · MATH245 · MATH2405 · MATHS265 · TRIG · TRIG1632 · MATH125 · MATH240S1687 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
57.69%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will do all the homework and can follow a soft-spoken, fast lecture; avoid if you need a slow beginner-friendly intro.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots Of HomeworkStep-By-Step ExamplesSoft-Spoken AccentTest HeavyMandatory Attendance
  • and care, others say he rushes and mumbles.
  • and if you keep up.
  • Stronger fit for students who already have some algebra base and attend every class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

As are possible with , but many report C/B ranges and .

Both formats require heavy practice; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Algebra and trig content is standard college math, but speed and .

Students with ; true beginners struggle in both formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as required, with skip-class-you-wont-pass style warnings.

Online Zoom and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

great if you work hard and hear him clearly, poor if you need slow scaffolding.

; online is more split on communication quality.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call him tough with exact answers; and study guides map cleanly to tests.

Format shift

Online students and notebook-only grades.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of and is treated as essential for passing tests.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy HW; winter/accelerated terms feel overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Many students love step-by-step examples and care, while others cite rushing, accent barriers, and low energy.

Format shift

Recent online praise exists, but mumbling and pace complaints also persist.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Chapter tests and as .

Format shift

In-person and and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Long in-person history shows a and moves quickly.

Main concern

Fast pacing and exact-answer tests punish students who fall behind early.

What students said

“He is the . Very understandable and reasonable when it comes to turning in your test.”
MATH125
“ ... he rushes through every lecture”
MATH125
“ because they have to have the exact answer”
TRIG240

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and complaints about mumbling, no Canvas grades, and hard tests.

Main concern

Soft speech and messy communication make already dense math harder online.

What students said

“He takes his time to show you the math problem step by step.”
MATH125
“most lectures are just mumbled & messy”
MATH245
“ . Keeps grades in his notebook and .”
TRIG240

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and lectures, but often demand exact answers and may include a few unpracticed items.

Chapter TestsExact Answers RequiredHomework-Aligned ExamsSome Non-HW Surprise QuestionsStudy Guide Helpful

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but exacting, sometimes with 2-3 unpracticed questions.

Exact Answer TestsStudy Guide Like TestSome Unpracticed Questions
“ because they have to have the exact answer”
TRIG240
“he always has 2-3 questions on a or in class”
TRIG240
“His study guide is exactly like the test. so make sure u do the study guide”
MATH125

Online

Online students say lecture content matches homework and chapter tests, though .

Chapter TestsLecture-Matched HomeworkLimited Test Feedback
“whatever he taught was exactly like the ”
MATH245
“ student understand”
TRIG
“if the examples and or homework”
MATH125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just listen and and you will have no worries.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (12 online, 38 in , and split teaching quality. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He takes his time to show you the math problem step by step. Each step he shows it clearly and .”

📚

28/100

“He does give alot of homework but .”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“ .”

⚡ Pace Concerns

35/100

“he rushes through every lecture ... if your 5 min late for class seems like you missed 5 chapters of the book”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • step by step
  • He is very methodological
  • Always writes down examples on the board

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Tests

  • because they have to have the exact answer
  • Do all the homework as assigned and you will pass the class
  • You need to truly KNOW the material

Theme 3

🔊 About Communication Barriers

  • soft mumbling
  • If
  • most lectures are just mumbled & messy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with , and care themes provide high credibility despite polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 59
3 out of 59
2 out of 56
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH12522 reviews
MATH24512 reviews
TRIG2404 reviews
TRIG3 reviews
MATHS2652 reviews
Show 6 more courses
TRIG17042 reviews
ALG1151 review
MATH24051 review
MATH240S16871 review
MTH1251 review
TRIG16321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3