AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Carolyn Magee

MGT202 · COAT85 · TYPING101 · CAOT082 · MGMT002 · BUS005 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

; if you have any choice.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedPoor communicationSlow gradingDo not recommendUnresponsive
  • and mostly 1-star quality ratings
  • , and
  • Students repeatedly say look elsewhere for the same courses

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Scattered grades and complete work.

Both formats report delayed or .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content itself varies, but disorganization and .

Online reviews emphasize chaotic due dates; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

, though some leave it unspecified.

Online and as mandatory when reported.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

; students explicitly tell others to look elsewhere.

Recommendation is negative in both online and in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report opaque grades, late scoring, and .

Format shift

and response time.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Multiple scattered due days each week and ungraded piles create heavy ongoing pressure.

Format shift

Online reviews especially stress many different due days per week.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Repeated claims of no teaching, unorganization, and failure to communicate or grade on time.

Format shift

Online and and availability.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of discussions, assignments, quizzes, and exams, but execution and .

Format shift

Exam detail is sparse; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person experiences include ungraded work, poor availability, and harsh or .

Main concern

Grades may stay incomplete late into or after the semester and office availability is unreliable.

What students said

“A disgrace to higher education. I'll be contacting administration. Nonsensical assignments that don't get graded, poor communication.”
BUS005
“Spring semester is over and I still do not know my final grade in the class since according to the gradebook, only half of .”
COAT85

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel chaotic with scattered due dates, weak Zoom skills, and poor grade communication.

Main concern

Missing or late grades and .

What students said

“The professor is very unorganized, refuses to put all the week on the module tab.”
COAT85
“The professor on the other hand was extremely unorganized, communication was not the best and if you have a question regarding your grades more than .”
MGT202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Limited exam detail overall, but after a cheating accusation.

In-person exam retake under suspicionUnclear grading criteriaDelayed grade posting

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

retake after an unfounded cheating accusation.

In-person exam retakeCheating accusation without apology
“I got an A on an exam, she accused me of cheating... and I in the Lab.”
CAOT082

Online

Online reviews ; they mainly report messy quizzes and delayed grades.

Scattered weekly quizzesDelayed grade feedback
“Has things due and several different days instead of one day out the week.”
COAT85

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I will never take ”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting disorganization, grading delays, and avoidance. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Disaster

15/100

“A disgrace to higher education. I'll be contacting administration. Nonsensical assignments that don't get graded, poor communication.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“I will never take ”

📂 Organization Issues

18/100

“ .”

📧 Communication Failure

20/100

“ . I've never had a professor give a midterm 1 week before the final.”

Theme 1

🗂️ About Organization

  • The
  • Inconsistent with the syllabus

Theme 2

📉

  • Only half of and it shows I have a fail

Theme 3

⚠️ About Trust & Climate

  • She accused me of cheating... She never apologized
  • A disgrace to higher education
  • EVER

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

10 reviews spanning many years are consistently negative, though older and sometimes short on course detail.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CAOT0823 reviews
COAT853 reviews
BUS0051 review
MGMT0021 review
MGT2021 review
Show 1 more courses
TYPING1011 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1