AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Olivia Garcia

CHDEV10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage a heavy online load with almost no instructor help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProWork heavyUnavailable for helpTough graderMixed reviewsGroup projects
  • Recent online review warns of heavy workload and unreachable professor
  • Older review reports a
  • Grades can be high but support and structure feel unreliable

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Both reviewers earned A or A- but the hard review required heavy work and self-navigation.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as not mandatory, but weekly Zooms were still expected and poorly run.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

One strong do-not-take warning outweighs a thin positive note for most students.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, yet both students still finished with A or A-.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students , and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Quality is mixed, with one student saying she was never available and communication channels failed.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tags emphasize tests and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CHDEV10 is hit-or-miss: one student called it work-heavy with a ghost professor, another got an A and .

Main concern

and unreachable email/phone leave students stranded.

What students said

“ so work-heavy and the professor was NEVER available for help.”
CHDEV10
“I took her got an A ”
CHDEV10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews flag a but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Test heavyGroup projects

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention tests and heavy work but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Test heavyGroup projects
“ ”
CHDEV10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so work-heavy and the professor was NEVER available for help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews, highlighting support failures and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Availability Crisis

20/100

“I emailed her about 8 times over this course, as well as called and texted the number she provided. Both her number and .”

📚 Heavy Workload

22/100

“It was so work-heavy and the .”

🙂 Mixed Positive Note

55/100

“I took her got an A ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Support

  • the
  • Both her number and
  • I took her got an A

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • It was so work-heavy
  • Group projects
  • A-

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two online reviews spanning 2022-2025 with conflicting tone and limited detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDEV102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values