AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Sandra Lee

PSY41 · ALL · PSYCH1 · PSYCH01 · PSY1 · PSYCHOLOGY1 · PSY0000 · PSY014 · HISTORY41 · PSCH1 · PSYCH3466 · PSYCH001 · PSY041 · PSYCHOLOGY014 · PSYC · PYS1 · ABNOR · PSYCH41 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can handle strict, high-effort psych work and unclear rubrics; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderVague assignment rulesHeavy video postsPolarizing online vs old praiseLots of reading
  • Recent online reviews often call her unclear, picky, and
  • Older in-person comments are mixed, with some passionate fans and some harsh critics
  • ; success requires strict adherence to her preferred format

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even strong students report B grades after heavy video work and picky scoring, so an A takes sustained high effort.

Online recent reviews are harsher on grade .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Critical-thinking assignments, frequent tests, and psych GE.

Online students stress video posts and biweekly tests; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some online sections mark attendance optional while others require participation; .

Online comments ; evidence is mixed overall.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

About 30% would take again and many recent detailed reviews explicitly warn others away.

posts.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough-grader tags, arbitrary scales, and harsh .

Format shift

A few older fans saw ; recent online evidence is much stricter.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and multi-video discussion requirements stack up.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are strongest; .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Knowledge and care get praise, but , and weak lecture delivery drag quality down.

Format shift

Online students feel unsupported; older in-person fans emphasize humor and passion.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and textbook reading rather than one pure mode.

Format shift

; older courses mention papers and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Older in-person reviews swing from love for humor and knowledge to claims of , and shifting criteria.

Main concern

Inconsistent expectations and .

What students said

“She changes the .”
PSY014
“Dr. Lee loves this subject. I could tell that she wanted her students to succeed.”
PSY41

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections draw frequent , and heavy workload, with a minority calling it a growth experience.

Main concern

Picky video discussions and .

What students said

“Vague instructions for assignments and grades harshly if you don't submit what she exactly wants.”
PSY014
“Theres a lot of .”
PSYCHOLOGY014

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on timed tests and heavily graded video or written work with .

Frequent testsVideo discussion postsTextbook-based quizzesUnclear rubrics

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; they mention papers, discussion posts, and delayed grades more than exam software.

Papers and discussion postsSlow grade turnaround
“she also takes forever to give you grades back on important items e.g. papers and discussion post”
PSYCH41

Online

Online evidence focuses on video submissions graded like presentations and tests every two weeks; no Lockdown Browser is clearly proven.

Video discussion postsTest every two weeksHarsh video grading
“There is a , but as long as you read the textbook, it should be an easy A.”
PSY014
“She leaves a lot of discussions and expects you to be a .”
PSY041

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please listen to the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting grading harshness, video work, and split reputations. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️

28/100

“ . .”

🎥 Stressful Video Work

30/100

“Theres a lot of .”

💔 Polarizing Experience

30/100

“By far the !”

📚 Some Students Learn a Lot

55/100

“I learned a lot about the subject and as a student.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very picky and lecture heavy
  • her lectures are useless
  • She always encourages

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Passing grades are unreasonably difficult to achieve in her class
  • I am a straight A student and got a B in her class
  • Still doable just gotta lowk try hard

Theme 3

📧 About Support and Clarity

  • Professor is incredibly unclear in her expectations for assignments
  • She provides no rubric for you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

35 reviews give volume, but opinions split sharply by era and many older comments are brief or empty.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PSY0145 reviews
PSY0414 reviews
PSYCH414 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY14 reviews
PSY413 reviews
Show 14 more courses
PSYCH12 reviews
05361 review
ABNOR1 review
ALL1 review
HISTORY411 review
PSCH11 review
PSY00001 review
PSY11 review
PSYC1 review
PSYCH0011 review
PSYCH011 review
PSYCH34661 review
PSYCHOLOGY0141 review
PYS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1