AI Rate Professor

Biology

Habte Tecle

MICRO4560 · MICRO101 · MICRO1 · MICRO1651 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if and tolerate uneven help; otherwise pick another instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnows subject wellLecture heavyTest heavyUnhelpful when askedInconsistent grading
  • Subject expertise is clear but .
  • Labs and ; .
  • Recent reviews report belittling, unhelpful answers, and contaminated lab materials.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

As are possible if and , but it is not a free A and effort is required.

One online A exists, but most A-friendly comments .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Micro content is standard-level with weekly quizzes and .

Difficulty comments are similar online and in person; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

.

and the online review; older labs rarely specify.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Only about a , and recent comments focus on poor help and weak teaching.

Online is strongly negative; and newer complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Clear criteria help if , but some call the .

Format shift

; online only notes an A without process detail.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Weekly quizzes, labs, and study notes keep a steady moderate load.

Format shift

; online mentions long slide lectures more than lab load.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Knows micro well but , and can belittle questions.

Format shift

Older in-person reviews are warmer; recent in-person and online reviews are much colder.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of lab work, frequent quizzes, and .

Format shift

In person stresses labs plus quizzes; online focuses on questions and slide content.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and help if you ask, others say he blames students and .

Main concern

Belittling responses, cross-contaminated lab materials, and .

What students said

“Asked for help, wouldnt answer& looked for something I am doing wrong”
MICRO1
“ not that great at teaching it.”
MICRO1
“Keep up with and read the intro to the labs.”
MICRO1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review calls him inconsiderate, unable to teach, and .

Main concern

No real help when you miss questions and .

What students said

“He literally cannot teach. You will sit through hours of .”
MICRO101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and frequent quizzes feel time-pressured; reviews .

Timed examsWeekly quizzesLab-based quizzesTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

double-check; weekly quizzes reward careful lab notes.

Timed examsWeekly quizzesReview notes help
“ as its always cutting it close”
MICRO1
“ and just study the material and should be fine.”
MICRO1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe exam format beyond graded questions he will not review.

Question review refused
“If you want to know which questions you got wrong he will not help you out.”
MICRO101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ not that great at teaching it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews spanning online and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🧠 Subject Knowledge vs Teaching

48/100

“ not that great at teaching it.”

👎 Recent Student Support

25/100

“Asked for help, wouldnt answer& looked for something I am doing wrong”

🧪

40/100

“tubes/ plates, are badly done or cross-contaminated b/c all students are using them at different times”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just not that great at teaching it
  • hours of
  • and helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • study, study, study!
  • very

Theme 3

⚠️ About Help & Fairness

  • Belittles me& doesnt answer until I asked a 2nd or 3rd time
  • !
  • vindictive with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews span 2007-2024 with mixed detail; opinions swing hard by year so confidence is only medium.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MICRO15 reviews
MICRO45604 reviews
MICRO1013 reviews
MICRO16511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values