AI Rate Professor

Art History

Denice Bartels

0112S1 · ART101 · ART102 · 11464SP21S · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready for and frequent plagiarism scrutiny in a GE art course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPlagiarism AccusationsHarsh FeedbackPolarizingParticipation Matters
  • Recent and plagiarism accusations with little recourse.
  • history lectures.
  • ; most students warn others away from her GE art classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and little make an A very hard to earn.

Online reviews stress plagiarism zeros; but older ones were more lenient.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call art history one of their hardest , and high difficulty ratings.

Both formats report high difficulty; online GE students especially feel overwhelmed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Some sections require attendance and participation; but participation still matters.

; online evidence is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Very low would-take-again and repeated warnings about harsh grading and .

Online ; older in-person reviews were more positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

use and little room to recover.

Format shift

and in-person recent reviews.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly reading, study guides, discussions, and as overwhelming by all.

Format shift

Online students emphasize discussion and .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Early praise for engaging lectures is outweighed by later reports of , and .

Format shift

; recent online reviews rate it very poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and writing rather than heavily detailed exam systems.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

early students praise interesting lectures and study guides, while , and unprofessional call-outs.

Main concern

, and plagiarism disputes that can tank grades.

What students said

“ because she is not the one.”
ART101
“She is an amazing teacher. When I first walked into class I thought oh great who cares about art? Wrong!”
ART101
“She's an amazing teacher, full of energy and genuinely cares about her students.”
ART102

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and plagiarism flags on discussions and short assignments with little chance to redo work.

Main concern

Harsh zeros and .

What students said

“ and honestly one of the ”
ART102
“Professor Bartels is quick to label someone for plagiarism without any proof.”
ART101
“ , and only 8/300 words) and she stated it was not okay. I asked to redo the assignment she said no. She gave a 0/50.”
11464SP21S

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy; risk .

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation more than specific exam security tools.

Study guidesParticipation required
“Study guides are given and if you study and pay attention you'll do great.”
ART101

Online

Online reviews ; complaints focus on assignment zeros.

Assignment-heavy gradingPlagiarism scrutiny
“I wish I never took her for online shes a tough grader like come on ”
ART101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please be careful before attending one of her classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews spanning online and in-person formats, . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

16/100

“ and honestly one of the ”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ because she is not the one.”

📝 Plagiarism Scrutiny

20/100

“Professor Bartels is quick to label someone for plagiarism without any proof.”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Split

38/100

“She is an amazing teacher. When I first walked into class I thought oh great who cares about art? Wrong!”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and honestly one of the
  • Shes such a
  • She gave a 0/50. I think thats extreme !!!!

Theme 2

⚠️ About Plagiarism Flags

  • quick to label someone for plagiarism without any proof
  • she said I plagiarized ( I used quotes, and only 8/300 words)
  • I was told that I plagiarizer in a definition which I clearly in my paragraph I said it wasn't

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Bartels made everything interesting and I learned so much from her
  • interesting stories to tell from when she visited some of the artworks
  • full of energy and genuinely cares about her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews spanning 2014-2023 with detailed complaints and some older positives; opinions shift over time but recent tone is consistent.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ART1017 reviews
ART1023 reviews
0112S11 review
11464SP21S1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1