AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Angela Cranon-Charles

POLSCI1 · POLITICALSCI1 · POLISCI001 · POLSC7 · POLSCI2 · POLISCI0190518 · POLSC007 · POLSCI001 · POS1 · POLISCI9 · POLISCI1 · POLSCI · POLSCI07 · POL019 · POL201 · POLSCI19 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
65.22%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will read, participate, and accept her political energy; skip if you need fast grades or a neutral vibe.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit availableRead the bookPolarizing personalityClear lectures for manyTough or delayed grading
  • Many students call her a rare gem who makes politics interesting with videos, debates, and .
  • A large minority report tough grading on a 100-point scale, slow grade posting, and a condescending style.
  • Online can be an easy A if you read weekly; in , and reading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many report easy A with reading and , but a 100-point scale and .

Online leans easier for readers; and notes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard intro poli sci; difficulty rises with reading volume and .

Both formats stress get ready to read.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

; skip class and you will not pass is a recurring tag.

Online still ties success to weekly posts; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

and structure; the rest warn of attitude and .

Online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and ; tough grader tags, 100-point classes, and delayed grades for others.

Format shift

Online discussions get dinged for minor issues; .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Weekly readings and discussions dominate; some sections have few exams and .

Format shift

Similar reading load online and in person.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Strong praise for making politics lively and caring; equally strong complaints about condescension and shallow teaching.

Format shift

Split appears in both formats across many years.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Discussions, quizzes, essays, group work, and exams share weight; is common.

Format shift

; online is discussion-heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Engaging lectures and debates for fans; critics say she reads the book, belittles disagreement, or grades late and hard.

Main concern

, and personality clashes if you disagree with her.

What students said

“An easy A if you attend all classes, participate in her entertaining yet knowledgeable class discussions”
POLISCI001
“the most condescending professor I have ever had”
POLISCI001

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, and book-based tests; many easy-A stories mixed with tough-grader and slow-grade complaints.

Main concern

and slow grade posting can tank a .

What students said

“If you just read the chapters and follow the ”
POLISCI001
“By far the ”
POLITICALSCI1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several students report open-note or cheat-sheet exams and risk.

Open note examsCheat sheet allowedBook answers on testsExtra credit on exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Open-note exams, cheat sheets, and occasional book-allowed tests appear in multiple in-person reviews.

Open noteCheat sheetBook for some tests
“ ”
POLSCI1
“She also lets you use a cheat sheet for her test”
POLISCI9

Online

; format details beyond that are limited.

Answers in the bookWeekly chapter tests
“Get the book because all of the answers to the !”
POLISCI001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a rare gem, and nice.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting the love-hate split on teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“she made it interesting and helped us to understand the importance of it”

👍 Recommendation Split

65/100

“ ! Easy A”

⚖️

48/100

“Class is only out of 100 points. This makes it so much harder to get an A.”

📖 Workload Reality

50/100

“BE SURE TO READ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loves to talk about politics and teaches it to what is happening today
  • She makes political science interesting
  • she only reads from the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you attend all classes
  • she is a

Theme 3

💬 About Personality

  • the most condescending professor I have ever had
  • She cares about her studenrts success
  • It is her way or the high way even if she is wrong

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

46 reviews spanning 2011-2023 with rich detail; polarized but , and personality.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 512

Course coverage

POLSCI111 reviews
POLISCI00110 reviews
POLSCI195 reviews
POLITICALSCI14 reviews
POL0192 reviews
Show 13 more courses
POLISCI12 reviews
34501 review
POL SCI 11 review
POL2011 review
POLISCI01905181 review
POLISCI91 review
POLSC0071 review
POLSC71 review
POLSCI1 review
POLSCI0011 review
POLSCI071 review
POLSCI21 review
POS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 3 · A 12

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 6

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 7