AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Martin Martirossian

MATH266 · MATH240 · MATH227 · MATH245 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
90.91%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Strong pick for students who need patient math help and will participate; expect delayed grades and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient helperLate grade postingParticipation mattersStraightforward testsAccent learning curve
  • and algebra support.
  • but grades slowly and lectures can feel off-syllabus.
  • A few recent reviews claim poor teaching or rude moments, so fit still matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many report A or , and taking straightforward tests with limited major assessments.

Most grade evidence is online; in-person still reports passable outcomes with effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Material is standard math with practice focus, but summer pace and calculus digressions can frustrate some.

Online summer classes feel fast; in-person difficulty is moderate.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as required for credit points.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Over 90 percent would take again, with strong praise for patience and pass-focused teaching despite a few harsh outliers.

Online recommendations dominate the sample; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Graded by few items and appear often, with straightforward tests for students who practice.

Format shift

Late posting is common online more than harsh markups.

Workload

Light

68/100

major tests, though participation is constant.

Format shift

One online review tags lots of homework; most call the load light.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Students praise step-by-step help and care, with some complaints about volume of talking, accent, or rare rudeness.

Format shift

Online praise is strong overall; in-person notes language barrier.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

A few tests plus homework and participation drive the .

Format shift

Online comments cite two tests and limited graded items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and cares, with a mild language barrier for some.

Main concern

Accent and clarity can require asking him to restate or seeking tutors.

What students said

“Professor Martirossian does just that, although, there is a slight language barrier (for me personally) be respectful and ask for him to reiterate.”
MATH227
“This prof is definitely knowledgable but can be difficult for students to understand, and not just because of his accent.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online and manageable homework, though grading is late and pacing can feel rushed.

Main concern

, and a minority report little teaching or rudeness.

What students said

“If you really want .”
MATH227
“Only issue is does not grade much and .”
MATH266
“Do not be deceived by the rating. He expects you to know the material without ever teaching it.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as straightforward with few high-stakes exams and .

Straightforward testsFew major examsHomework

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on lecture clarity and .

Lecture heavyParticipation
“Professor Martirossian does just that, although, there is a slight language barrier”
MATH227
“Definitely reach out to tutors if you aren't good at math.”
MATH227

Online

Online reviews describe a small number of straightforward tests and .

Straightforward testsFew graded itemsHomework
“ .”
MATH266
“Overall we only had 2 tests.”
Math240

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you really want . The world needs more professors like him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (9 online, 2 in , and high take-again support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Student-First Teaching

74/100

“His goal is to help us pass and get closer to our career paths.”

⏱️ Late Grade Black Box

40/100

“ .”

👍 Strong Recommendation

88/100

“ !”

⚠️ Occasional Harsh Critiques

30/100

“He belittled a classmate for asking questions and was over all very rude.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he kept it simple and do the homework. If you have a question, ask him he will help you solve it step by step.
  • he doesn't speak loudly which can be an issue to some.
  • He talks more than he teaches.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Not much hw, very manageable.
  • Grades everything last minute so you'll never know your grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He's an amazing professor even online.
  • We need more math professors like him!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews with rich detail across several math courses and years, mostly consistent praise plus a .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2276 reviews
Math2453 reviews
Math2401 review
MATH2661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3