AI Rate Professor

Anatomy

Kelvin Harris Jr.

ANAT32 · ANATOMY · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Run away from this Anatomy section; students warn .

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely DisorganizedNo SyllabusUnpredictable TestsIgnores EmailsNursing Students Beware
  • Every review rates him 1-2 with max difficulty and .
  • Students report missing syllabus , and .
  • Chronic disorganization, tardiness, and no email replies make the class feel unsafe for nursing tracks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

, and warnings that study guides do not match exams.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

5/100

Anatomy content plus extreme disorganization and test-heavy design make the course brutal.

Evidence comes only from in-person Anatomy reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several reviews mark attendance mandatory amid already chaotic class conditions.

Only in-person data; as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and repeated stay-away warnings for nursing students.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

, and low reported grades with .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and long exams with little useful prep material.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students call him the , and unpredictable.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Pop quizzes, long exams, and test-heavy tags dominate; no syllabus clarity on assessment counts.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All five in-person Anatomy reviews describe chaos: late or , and ignored emails.

Main concern

, and near-zero organization.

What students said

“he's awful”
ANATOMY
“We were given our syllabus till the last week of the semester.”
ANATOMY
“ .”
ANAT32

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

guides, and supported by late or missing syllabi.

Pop QuizzesLong ExamsStudy Guides MismatchNo Clear Syllabus

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

study guides or irrelevant ones, and no syllabus until near term end.

Pop QuizzesLong ExamsIrrelevant Study GuidesLate Syllabus
“ of school, his exams are very long”
ANATOMY
“no study guide before test. .”
ANATOMY

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nursing students, stay away!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person Anatomy reviews with zero online data. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Disaster

10/100

“ .”

📉 Organization Collapse

8/100

“We were given our syllabus till the last week of the semester.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ .”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Organization

  • Never gave a syllabus or .
  • He was often tardy from 30 min - 1.5 hours.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • things that are on there have nothing to do with the exams

Theme 3

🚫 About Advice

  • he's awful
  • don't take his class he is the !
  • Nursing students, stay away!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistently scathing reviews with matching disorganization themes, though most are older (2015) with one 2022 note.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ANATOMY4 reviews
ANAT321 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values