AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Tommetta Shaw

CHDEV44 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you need this exact class and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkSo many papersTough graderGroup projectsBoring lectures
  • Both reviews rate quality low despite passable grades.
  • Workload is heavy with many papers, projects, and group work.
  • Students say she talks about herself and feels boring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Students still earned A and B+, but , and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty ratings and heavy project load make the course feel hard relative to reward.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and another says it was mandatory.

Both reports are in person and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students express regret and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and regretful tone suggest strict .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Lots of homework, so many papers, heavy projects, and group work dominate the experience.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students say lectures are boring and self-focused even when some learning occurs.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Papers, projects, participation, and group work appear central rather than exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CHDEV44 is described as overloaded with papers and and .

Main concern

and low engagement for the effort required.

What students said

“ and heavy projects. .”
CHDEV44
“She talked a lot about herself. Learned a lot in her class. She was just boring”
CHDEV44

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews and focus instead on papers and projects.

Heavy papersGroup projectsParticipation matters

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize papers, projects, and participation .

So many papersHeavy projectsGroup projects
“ and heavy projects.”
CHDEV44

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and heavy projects. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting workload overload and low engagement. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Overwhelming Workload

15/100

“ and heavy projects. .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She talked a lot about herself. Learned a lot in her class. She was just boring”

👎 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ . It was doable but way too unnecessary.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and heavy projects
  • Lots of homework

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She talked a lot about herself
  • She was just boring
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

, so signal is consistent but still thin.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDEV442 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values