AI Rate Professor

Education

Gail Amos

CHILDDEV7 · CD2 · CD1 · CHDEV22 · CHDEV042 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can flex around fixed center hours; avoid if you need schedule freedom or solid online teaching.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring in personLots of homeworkInflexible placementsClear feedbackGroup projects
  • and clear expectations with A/A+ outcomes.
  • Online and practicum placement reviews slam inflexibility and weak support.
  • Attendance and site hours are mandatory and schedule-unfriendly for working students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Finishers report A/A+ with lots of work and participation, but rigid hours and a .

+; the online review gave no grade and was negative.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Child development content is manageable with , though writing and group work add load.

Both formats rate difficulty around mid-range; online felt empty rather than hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and skip class means you will not pass.

; the online review said attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About half the , but placement inflexibility and online failure pull others away.

Positive recommendation is almost all in-person; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Completers report A/A+ with and .

Format shift

+; online left grade blank.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students note lots of , and mandatory observation hours.

Format shift

In-person mentions heavy work; .

Teaching experience

Good

62/100

In-person students praise thorough lectures and caring help; online and placement stories are harsh.

Format shift

In-person quality often 4-5; the sole online review scored 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and placement hours more than big exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and group projects over exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

accessible, thorough, and clear on expectations, though one student dropped over rigid mandatory placement hours.

Main concern

Mandatory center hours and sites she chooses, not student schedules.

What students said

“Professor Amos is a real gem! and caring and is always willing to help!”
CHILDDEV7
“Professor Gail makes her students attend to the center she wants and the time she picks for them to complete their mandatory hours for the course by not caring if we have to work or .”
CHDEV22

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online review calls her inept at distance learning, with outdated handouts, ignored emails, and .

Main concern

No help with group communication and no meaningful online instruction.

What students said

“She is inept at teaching online during distance learning. Lots of typos & she didnt bother to update the handouts she posted for assignments.”
CHDEV042

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe exams; assessment is mainly assignments, projects, and participation.

Group projectsAssignment heavyLittle exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring policies.

Participation mattersGroup projects
“GIVE LOTS OF WORK, BUT EASY TO KEEP UP”
CD2

Online

Online review mentions a and art-style assignments but .

Group finalArt projects
“She didnt help at all when I wasnt receiving communication from my group for !”
CHDEV042

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Amos is a real gem! and caring and is always willing to help!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (1 online, 5 in person), highlighting care versus inflexibility. Credibility rating: Medium.

💎 In-Person Care

62/100

“Professor Amos is a real gem! and caring and is always willing to help!”

📅 Rigid Placement Hours

22/100

“ as other professor that will let you pick the center and time”

📚 Heavy But Doable Work

38/100

“GIVE LOTS OF WORK, BUT EASY TO KEEP UP”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I LEARNED A LOT. IF YOU NEED TO .
  • she a very thorough professor in her lectures and activities

Theme 2

⚠️ About Flexibility & Online

  • She is not flexible as other professor that will let you pick the center and time
  • She is inept at teaching online during distance learning
  • No learning happens in this class.

Theme 3

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • GIVE LOTS OF WORK, BUT EASY TO KEEP UP
  • its just alot of writing going on
  • A+

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews from 2009-2021 with mixed tone and limited grade detail; online sample is only one review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CD22 reviews
CD11 review
CHDEV0421 review
CHDEV221 review
CHILDDEV71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1