AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Gail Amos

CHDEV22 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can meet her fixed center schedule with no flexibility needs.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInflexible placementsMandatory attendanceSkip class failGroup projectsNot recommended
  • Single review describes forced observation centers and times that ignore work and other classes.
  • Student dropped and professor.
  • Participation is mandatory and skipping means failing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

The only student dropped or withdrew and said her setup made the course harder than other professors.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Difficulty stems less from theory and more from rigid mandatory placements that clash with real schedules.

Only in-person evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and no schedule choice for required hours.

Only in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Student explicitly would not take her again after dropping over inflexible center requirements.

Only in-person evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

an A under her placement rules.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

of other courses and work create heavy schedule load.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Compared unfavorably with another CD professor; described as making things hard without flexibility.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on participation, group projects, and mandatory observation hours.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person CHDEV22 review says she forces students into her chosen center and hours, making the class much harder than peers.

Main concern

No choice of observation site or time for working students.

What students said

“Professor Gail forces students to only observe children at the center she wants not given students the and time thats works for our schedule specially if we have other courses and work.”
CHDEV22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format; the .

Participation mattersGroup projectsMandatory hours

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; risk is forced observation sites and mandatory participation.

Mandatory observation hoursParticipation mattersGroup projects
“Professor Gail forces students to only observe children at the center she wants not given students the and time thats works for our schedule”
CHDEV22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Gail forces students to only observe children at the center she wants not given students the and time thats works for our schedule specially if we have other courses and work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review focused on placement inflexibility. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

8/100

“No”

📅 Forced Center Hours

10/100

“forces students to only observe children at the center she wants not given students the and time”

📉

12/100

“”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Placement Rules

  • forces students to only observe children at the center she wants
  • not given students the and time
  • specially if we have other courses and work

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • another professor who didnt make things hard as professor Gail
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent negative review with high detail but no corroborating sample or grade breadth.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDEV221 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1