AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Stephanie White

SOC004 · SOC20 · SOCIOLOGY · SOC1 · SOCIO1 · SOC01 · SOC002 · SOCIOLOGY1 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to teach yourself the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedSelf-taught courseOff-topic lecturesConfusingDo not take
  • , and disconnected from tests.
  • Students say .
  • and harsh warnings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Reported grades cluster around C-level and students say even daily attendance does not protect the .

the limited online sample.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Heavy reading, packed content, and teaching support.

; in-person comments also stress volume and confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory, though if you only show up for tests.

In-person comments conflict between required attendance and ; online evidence is thin.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Would-take-again is effectively zero and comments .

; one older online review is milder but still not a strong endorsement.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students report and .

Format shift

Grade complaints are strongest in in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and test-heavy structure are common complaints.

Format shift

Workload pressure appears mainly in in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is unorganized, off-topic, unclear teaching that forces self-instruction.

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed but still note limited support; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, papers, midterms or finals, and study-from-the-book assessment dominate over effective lectures.

Format shift

Online notes double-attempt quizzes; and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing unorganized lectures, tests , and little real teaching.

Main concern

while dealing with and tough outcomes.

What students said

“ , so you will basically be teaching yourself.”
SOC1
“ !!”
SOC01
“ . Goes off-tangent during lectures A LOT”
SOCIOLOGY1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student found her sweet with and confusing.

Main concern

Little instructional support and .

What students said

“One thing you have to be ready for is communicating with her and really asking questions.”
SOC01
“she does not give you a study guide for .”
SOCIO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and do not reliably match lectures, so they feel standard-to-harsh rather than friendly.

Textbook-based examsIn-class essay examsStudy guides sometimesSelf-taught prep

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as book-based or essay-style and often disconnected from lectures.

In-class essay examsTests not matching lecturesTextbook reading requiredStudy guide before midterm/final sometimes
“ , so you will basically be teaching yourself.”
SOC1
“You have in class essay exams. As long as you attend class,read and study you'll do fine!”
SOC002

Online

Online or and chapter review for midterms and finals, with mixed study-guide support.

Quizzes with two attemptsChapter-based midterms/finalsInconsistent study guides
“ . For midterms/finals its vital to review the chapters though.”
SOC01
“she does not give you a study guide for .”
SOCIO1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews (2 online, 12 in person), highlighting disorganization and self-teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ ! She doesn't teach the subject and she expects you to understand what she never taught.”

📚

25/100

“ , so you will basically be teaching yourself.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ .”

😵 Confusion Level

20/100

“She sometime goes off topic and confuse her students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes off-tangent during lectures A LOT
  • she just reads out of the book and she forgets a lot of stuff

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I went to class everyday ... and still ended up with a C
  • get ready to read a lot from the textbook and long papers
  • Not an easy A but it can be achieved!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Experience Quality

  • YOU WILL NOT LEARN!!
  • This class was a joke!
  • DO NOT

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews with strong negative consistency, but older dates and only two online reviews lower overall confidence.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

SOC013 reviews
SOCIOLOGY13 reviews
SOC12 reviews
SOC202 reviews
SOC0021 review
Show 3 more courses
SOC0041 review
SOCIO11 review
SOCIOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

5

C 4 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1