AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jian Jiang

MATH227 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if you need a managed classroom, office hours, or a smooth path through MATH227.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPoor classroom controlDisruptive environmentLots of homeworkMandatory attendanceNo office hours
  • Student says the professor knew the material but never controlled the class.
  • Constant talking and disruptions made learning hard, with no office hours.
  • Attendance and participation matter heavily, yet the student still dropped.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Student says the content should have been easy, but the chaotic environment and a smooth A.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty rated 4 and constant disruptions made learning harder than the material alone required.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and tags say skip class and you will not pass, with participation required.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

and frames the class as a bad environment despite content knowledge.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

; the core complaint is environment and .

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Tag and mandatory participation.

Format shift

Workload signal comes only from the in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Knowledgeable on content, but weak classroom control, belittling remarks, and no office hours hurt the experience.

Format shift

Teaching evaluation is .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments emphasize homework and .

Format shift

and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH227 and participation, lots of homework, and no office hours.

Main concern

Classroom management failures make an otherwise approachable class hard to learn in.

What students said

“he never had control of the class and often referred to them as "not college students".”
MATH227
“No office hours to talk to him outside of class.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; risk is more about class climate than tested exam policy.

Participation mattersMandatory attendance

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final logistics, only participation and homework pressure.

Participation matters
“There were constant disruptions and made learning difficult.”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Jiang was knowledgeable of the material. However, he never had control of the class and often referred to them as "not college students".”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review centered on classroom management failure. Credibility rating: Low.

🏫 Classroom Control

20/100

“he never had control of the class”

🚪 Access to Help

18/100

“No office hours to talk to him outside of class.”

📉 Overall Experience

15/100

“This should have been an easy class. Bad environment”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Environment

  • never had control of the class
  • Constant talking during lectures
  • Bad environment

Theme 2

📈

  • Lots of homework
  • Participation matters
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed in-person review exists, so but thinly supported.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2271 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1