AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Roman Selezinka

MATH227 · MATH115 · MATH110 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Strong pick if you fear math and will show up; expect and solid lectures, with .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesStays after classMath-lab supportCaringClear grading criteria
  • Most students call him one of the and real help.
  • He invests extra time in the math lab and after class until you understand.
  • A , and hard MATH227 summer sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many report A or A+ with study guides and help, though a and no .

Grade success stories are mostly in person; the online student earned a B+ with required study.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material is approachable for anxious beginners when he slows down, though some summer or stats sections still feel hard.

; difficulty spikes appear in some in-person MATH227 comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

, and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

and the online section.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Strong majority praise him as on fairness.

Online evidence is fully positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

66/100

and high grades are common, but a minority call him a .

Format shift

Tough-grader complaints are in-person MATH227 only.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and attendance matter, yet study guides and extra help keep the load manageable for most.

Format shift

Workload comments are mainly from in-person courses.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Clear lectures, worksheets, after-class tutoring, and confidence-building define the dominant student experience.

Format shift

Excellence is consistent online and in person aside from two outliers.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Homework, lectures, tests, and study-guide-supported exams .

Format shift

Balanced assessment is described primarily in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly rave about accessibility, worksheets, study guides, and confidence-building teaching, with two harsh MATH227 outliers.

Main concern

A couple of students allege favoritism and picky homework grading in MATH227.

What students said

“ to ensure you understand.”
MATH110
“ ! He has favoritism, helped out this girl during exams which wasnt fair”
MATH227
“So dedicated he would help me after class in the math lab until i understood 100%.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One online summer MATH110 review , and a B after hard work.

Main concern

Single online review cannot confirm grading strictness or .

What students said

“Mr Selezinka Changed my Life . I was so afraid to take Math I waited until my last 3 semesters”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

study guides and post-test solutions rather than exotic proctoring.

Tests with study guidesTest solutions reviewedHomework graded carefullyLecture worksheets

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are paired with study guides, solution reviews, and .

Study guidesTest solutions after examsStrict homework grading reported
“He gives out study guides and after he gives the test solutions.”
MATH115
“He graded the home work strictly, if you missed one problem from a section you received a low grade overall.”
MATH227

Online

Online review emphasizes lectures, notes, attendance, and studying .

Attendance is a MustStudy to pass
“ ! You will pass if You study! I passed with an B .”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ to ensure you understand. He is the best Math teacher i have ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (1 online, 10 in person), highlighting support, lectures, and rare fairness complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Having a hard time in Math? The ! He will make time for you in the math lab”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“After class he offered to tutor his own students in the math lab.”

⚠️ Fairness Concerns

40/100

“He has favoritism, helped out this girl during exams which wasnt fair to the rest of us!”

👍 Recommendation

82/100

“If you want to learn maths the right way, then go for him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • For lecture, he passes out his own worksheet with the tables and etc, so .
  • He had really good lectures & Notes !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I don't think I'll be graduating because this class was very difficult.
  • No !
  • Too good to be real for a math instructor.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He cares about his students.
  • Mr Selezinka Changed my Life
  • So dedicated he would help me after class in the math lab until i understood 100%.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed reviews with many A/A+ grades and recurring help themes support a Medium-High picture, slightly reduced by polarization in MATH227.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1107 reviews
MATH2273 reviews
MATH1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1