AI Rate Professor

Political Science

D.L. Horne

POLSCE · POLSCI1 · POLSCIOO1 · POLSCI001 · POLI1 · POLSC1 · POLISCI1 · POLITICALSCI · POLSCI · POLSCIENCE · PSINTRO · POLSCI01 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and care about civic rights content; recent organization complaints make this a risky choice.

Best fit · Budget FirstBill of Rights focusUnorganized lecturesOften lateRights-focused for minoritiesTest heavy
  • Older students rave about rights education, humor, and easy passable tests.
  • Recent reviews slam rambling lectures, lateness, no-shows, and .
  • Expect , and optional-feeling attendance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

74/100

Many call tests easy and say an A or B is likely if you memorize amendments and , though .

All evidence is in person; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Intro poli-sci content is manageable, but rambling lectures and heavy question counts can still confuse passive students.

All course-easiness evidence is from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

, though some still advise going so he knows your face.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Would-take-again is only about 25 percent, and recent students strongly warn others off despite older praise.

All recommendation evidence is in person, with newer reviews more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Historical comments say easy tests and guaranteed A or B with participation and amendment work, though surprise test content frustrates some.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Core work is quizzes, midterm, final, amendment memorization, and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Knowledgeable and inspiring for many, yet frequently late, unprepared, and for others.

Format shift

Teaching quality .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

, and amendment tests dominate over papers or continuous assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Budget First

All reviews are in person and highly polarized: inspiring easy civic learning for .

Main concern

Lecture organization and inconsistent.

What students said

“I encourage anyone of color, and anyone not originally !”
POLISCI1
“This guy is all over the place. And he doesnt like to write anything on the board during class.”
POLSCIOO1
“Easy as Hell!!! Helpful!!! If your a !!!”
POLI1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Older reviews describe easy or ; newer students say tests often do not match lectures.

Take-home midterm and final reportedAmendments memorization testEasy tests with many questionsLecture and book misalignment complaints

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, midterm, final, amendments test; , and .

Take-home midterm and finalMemorize 10 amendmentsEasy but long testsTests not always from book
“You have to memorize your Bill of Rights Ammenments 1-10, Take home Mid-term and Final”
POLISCI1
“2 quizzes, 1 midterm and a final. Must pass an amendments test”
POLISCI1
“Emphasizes the use of the book and notes yet the test is about 10% based on them.”
POLISCI1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dont waste your time with this professor. Periodt”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews (0 online), highlighting rights-focused value versus organization and reliability issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Dr. Horne was an exceptional instructor, he was knowledgable in the subject matter.”

📉 Recent Frustrations

25/100

“Lectures are all over the place its hard to know when one subject begins and the next begins.”

📗 Easy Path Reports

74/100

“Easy as Hell!!! Helpful!!! If your a !!!”

👎 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“if you value !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He just runs his mouth.
  • All the knowledge is in his head. Man it is awsome to see him work.
  • he can do a better job at explaining things. He rambles on about other things

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !
  • but a lot of questions.
  • You will not learn a lot from him, but expects to know it.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Rights & Relevance

  • You will learn so much about the law and your rights as an American citizen.
  • I suggest this class to every minonity student.
  • You have to memorize your Bill of Rights Ammenments 1-10

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen all in-person reviews across many years give solid volume, but extreme old-versus-new polarization lowers confidence in a single stable experience.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

POLISCI14 reviews
POLSCI12 reviews
POLI11 review
POLITICALSCI1 review
POLSC11 review
Show 7 more courses
POLSCE1 review
POLSCI1 review
POLSCI0011 review
POLSCI011 review
POLSCIENCE1 review
POLSCIOO11 review
PSINTRO1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1