AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Milo Egippciaco

PSYC101 · PSY01 · PSYCH1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate off-topic lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOff-topic lecturesTest heavyTough graderControversial focusInconsistent
  • Most students say lectures wander into personal life and LGBTQ topics instead of core psychology.
  • teaches from.
  • One glowing review exists, but the majority call the class a waste of time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and test-heavy load mean an A takes heavy textbook self-study.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Average difficulty is very high and students say .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; others do not contradict strict in-person expectations.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again is only about 50% and four of five reviews .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tough Grader and TEST .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and frequent quizzes or exams from the textbook.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most students say he rambles off-topic and rarely teaches the tested material, despite one passionate positive review.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and quizzes dominate and are drawn from the book more than lecture.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person PSYCH1 is polarizing: one student loved group discussions and fair exams, while four say he talks about himself or LGBTQ topics and .

Main concern

Content drift and .

What students said

“Wants to spend the class talking about personal issues and never discusses the subject.”
PSYCH1
“ ... You have to read the .”
PSYCH1
“ !! THE PROFESSOR'S PERFORMANCE IS TERRIBLE. DOESN'T STAY ON COURSE.”
PSY01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are frequent and book-driven; preparation help is mixed by student.

Book-based testsQuizzesFair when preparedTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

barely covers in class; one student found them fair with prep.

Book-based testsQuizzesTest heavy
“His exams and . He will tell you when they are and help you prepare for them.”
PSYCH1
“Then the never used.”
PSYCH1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Wants to spend the class talking about personal issues and never discusses the subject. Then the never used.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2017, highlighting off-topic lectures and book-based tests. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ !! THE PROFESSOR'S PERFORMANCE IS TERRIBLE. DOESN'T STAY ON COURSE.”

📚 Book-Based Exams

45/100

“You have to read the , because ”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“Horrible teacher. Don't waste your time. Can't believe he actually has a job.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wants to spend the class talking about personal issues and never discusses the subject.
  • He would talk and talk about things not important to the subject.
  • Amazing professor. Glad I had him as my professor. He's very passionate about the subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to read the
  • TEST HEAVY

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Focus

  • Class is majorly on LGBTQ. He barely touches the book
  • DOESN'T STAY ON COURSE.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five in-person reviews spanning 2008-2017 with mixed detail; opinions are polarized but consistently flag off-topic lecturing.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYCH13 reviews
PSY011 review
PSYC1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values