AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

J Jiang

MATH227 · MATH105 · MATH125 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if you can self-teach from printed notes.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRushes lecturesTough graderLots of homeworkHard to ask questionsAttendance critical
  • Recent students report rushed lectures and little help with questions
  • and lots of
  • Older reviews are mixed but newer ones strongly advise avoiding him

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tough grading and C-range outcomes show an A and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

High difficulty ratings and rushed, example-light lectures make the content hard to absorb.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and warn that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again is effectively zero and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags and C or .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework and lecture-heavy pacing leave a heavy weekly load.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Rushed lectures, limited examples, and poor question handling dominate recent feedback despite a few older positives.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

, and homework mix with lecture-based assessment.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math courses feel rushed with , and ; older positive notes exist but recent feedback is strongly negative.

Main concern

Rushes material, resists repeating answers, and .

What students said

“He rushes through the material without stopping for questions.”
MATH227
“be patient because he doesnt do well with people asking him questions”
MATH105
“Horrible! Can't speak proper english and part of the course is to teach calculator use, well forget about it!!!”
227

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but limited in-class examples still make tests feel hard.

Take-home quizzesLecture-based testsPrinted notes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but students still struggle due to rushed coverage and few examples.

Take-home quizzesPrinted notes
“He prints out notes for you and but he doesnt cover many examples in class.”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He rushes through the material without stopping for questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2019, weighted toward recent critical themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Clarity

35/100

“He rushes through the material without stopping for questions.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ !”

📝 Workload

28/100

“Lots of homework”

🎯

28/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He rushes through the material without stopping for questions
  • he doesnt do well with people asking him questions
  • Can't speak proper english

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • hard but fair

Theme 3

🚪

  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews spanning 2009-2019 give a usable sample, but mixed eras and sparse grade detail lower confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1052 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
2271 review
MATH2271 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1