AI Rate Professor

English

Michelle Nava

ENGLISH210902 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Skip if you need a ; only risk it if you can self-structure and grind the work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganized lessonsHeavy workloadFirst-term issuesInconsistent feedbackNot helpful
  • Two of three reviews urge avoiding her due to chaotic lesson plans
  • Workload is described as too heavy and unhelpful
  • One student said she improved mid-term as a first-time teacher

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Even the positive review says you must put the work in, while others call the load excessive and teaching unhelpful.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

High difficulty ratings and chaos in lesson plans make the course feel harder than it should.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility remains unclear.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Two strongly negative reviews outweigh one cautious positive about improvement.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Little direct grade data; the softer review says putting in work lets you pass.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly say she assigns too much work for the class organization level.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

and unhelpful delivery dominate most comments.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Heavy work and lesson-plan issues point to .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English reviews split between harsh disorganization complaints and one note that she improved after a messy start.

Main concern

Scattered lesson plans, heavy work, and limited helpfulness.

What students said

“ if you can.”
ENGLISH210902
“She seems to be all over the place with her teaching...Not helpful and gives to much work.”
ENGLISH210902
“When the spring term started she was all over the place with her lesson plan but as the term when on she got better.”
ENGLISH210902

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; stress is on workload and disorganization.

Unclear exam structureHeavy written work

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students mainly complain about workload and lesson structure.

Unclear exam structureHeavy written work
“Not helpful and gives to much work”
ENGLISH210902

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person English reviews from one term, capturing majority negatives plus one recovery note. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She seems to be all over the place with her teaching...Not helpful and gives to much work.”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“ if you can.”

📝 Workload

25/100

“gives to much work”

🌱 Improvement Note

55/100

“as the term when on she got better. This was her first term teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • all over the place with her lesson plan
  • I don't even know how someone ever let her teach in the first place
  • I feel she needs a better lesson plan

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • gives to much work
  • If you put the work in you will pass the class
  • I hate this class and can't wait until this term is over

Theme 3

⚖️ Mixed Signals

  • Michelle is a great professor and understanding
  • as the term when on she got better

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three same-course reviews from one term give a but a small, first-term sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGLISH2109023 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values