AI Rate Professor

English

. Issac

ENG101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

and lectures confuse most students.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear explanationsDelayed feedbackLots of essaysConfusing assignmentsHarsh early grades
  • Most students find explanations unclear and .
  • and delayed grades until semester end.
  • A few still earn A/B grades, but majority rate quality low and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earned A or B, but many report unfair low grades and no guidance until too late.

All evidence is from in-person ENG101 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Many rate difficulty 4-5 with lots of essays, big words, and .

All evidence is from in-person ENG101 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

No review clearly .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most call her not worth it or and .

All evidence is from in-person ENG101 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report low grades with , and .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple essays, research papers, and high expectations for MLA and analysis.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Repeated complaints about unclear explanations, big words without clarity, and no communication.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Course centers on essays and .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ENG101 reviews mostly criticize unclear teaching, late grades, and .

Main concern

Grades returned too late and little guidance .

What students said

“she gave back the grades for all the so wwe never knew how to improve”
ENG101
“She does not explain the work properly, nor does she inform you where you need to work better on”
ENG101
“avoid”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay-driven with little mention of traditional proctored exams.

Essay heavyResearch paperMLA format

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize essays and research papers; .

Essay heavyResearch paperMLA format
“Lots, and lots of essays!”
ENG101
“7 page research paper and 3 other 500 word papers”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she gave back the grades for all the so wwe never knew how to improve”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and essay load. Credibility rating: Medium.

😕 Teaching Clarity

28/100

“She does not explain the work properly, nor does she inform you where you need to work better on”

⏳

22/100

“she gave back the grades for all the so wwe never knew how to improve”

🚫 Recommendation

25/100

“ ”

📝 Workload

28/100

“Lots, and lots of essays!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not very good at explaining things
  • throws big words around and
  • Never communicates with the students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I tried my best only sleeping 2 hours and yet still got low grades
  • I GOT AN A...I was surprised. He kept giving me low grades
  • !

Theme 3

📚 About Assignments

  • Lots, and lots of essays!
  • 7 page research paper and 3 other 500 word papers
  • Be sure you know MLA format

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eight in-person reviews from 2005-2013 show mostly consistent negatives, but all are old and lack formal grades.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1018 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values