AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Earnestine Robertson

POLI1 · POLSC0000 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a caring, highly knowledgeable political science professor who rewards engaged students.

Best fit · Effort For RewardBest professor everHighly knowledgeableNo nonsense careMotivates genuine studentsEasy going with high standards
  • Students call her the , engaging political science teaching.
  • She is friendly yet no-nonsense and strongly wants students to succeed.
  • Strong grades are reachable with solid notes and participation even without heavy textbook use.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students report extremely strong results with notes and participation, and one did extremely well without opening the book much.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings are low and students say notes plus participation keep the material manageable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, though participation is repeatedly linked to success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Multiple students say she is the and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students describe strong outcomes and a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

Book use is light for lectures and success is tied more to notes and participation than heavy volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly call her the , and care.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Success centers on notes, participation, and some textbook study rather than pure exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise her as the : interesting lectures, deep knowledge, and high care for student success.

Main concern

She expects genuine effort and participation, not a pure push-over path.

What students said

“This is the . She makes the class interesting & is highly knowledgeable”
POLSC0000
“I didn't open the book much this semester, yet I still managed to do EXTREMELY well in her class.”
POLI1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the . She makes the class interesting & is highly knowledgeable of the information she's presenting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching excellence and achievable grades. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

96/100

“This is the . She is intelligent, thoughtful & highly knowledgeable”

❤️ Student Success Focus

90/100

“She will motivate and encourage . Extremely compromising but not a push-over.”

📈 Grade Accessibility

84/100

“I didn't open the book much this semester, yet I still managed to do EXTREMELY well in her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the class interesting & is highly knowledgeable
  • She is intelligent, thoughtful & highly knowledgeable
  • She is refreshing & not on any power trips

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I didn't open the book much this semester, yet I still managed to do EXTREMELY well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three detailed but older reviews (2006-2012) that are highly consistent and all five-star.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLSC00002 reviews
POLI11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values