AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mehdi Mirfattah

MATH115 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself math and accept a hard, high-work path with little cushion.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy workloadHomework-exam mismatchStay away warningSelf-study requiredFinal-heavy grading
  • Majority of reviews urge students to avoid him for MATH115
  • Work and and
  • One milder review found him fair and helpful if you self-tutor

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students report no , final-heavy grades, and even full effort can still yield a D.

Evidence comes only from in-person MATH115 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about hard-to-understand material and heavy work mark it as challenging.

Evidence comes only from in-person MATH115 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Two strong stay-away reviews outweigh one mixed positive, so overall recommendation is low.

Evidence comes only from in-person MATH115 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Described as straightforward with no and grades that can rest heavily on the final.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students report , and labs that still may not pay off.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

One student found him helpful, but more say he is hard to understand and material does not line up.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from in-person MATH115 reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, yet grades are described as .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MATH115 feedback is mostly negative: , and slim pass chances unless highly independent.

Main concern

Heavy work that and grades that can depend heavily on the final.

What students said

“STAY AWAY FROM THIS INSTRUCTOR,BAD NEWS!!”
MATH115
“I did all the and I still got a D.”
MATH115
“ if you can teach yourself.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are portrayed as tough and misaligned with .

Final-heavy gradingHomework and exams may not matchNo extra credit

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments describe homework-exam mismatch, no , and .

Final-heavy gradingHomework and exams may not matchNo extra credit
“He gives entirely too much work and he gives a lot of different information on the homework and .”
MATH115
“strait forward grading no at all.”
MATH115
“he bases your grade on the final.”
MATH115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“STAY AWAY FROM THIS INSTRUCTOR,BAD NEWS!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person MATH115 reviews, highlighting workload, grading risk, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

25/100

“STAY AWAY FROM THIS INSTRUCTOR,BAD NEWS!!”

📚 Heavy Misaligned Work

22/100

“He gives entirely too much work and he gives a lot of different information on the homework and .”

🧠

30/100

“ if you can teach yourself.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I did all the and I still got a D.
  • he bases your grade on the final.
  • strait forward grading no at all.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hard to understand.
  • and he showed me many ways to solve the problems.
  • if you can teach yourself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three consistent MATH115 reviews from 2009-2010 with detailed warnings, though sample is small and dated.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1153 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values