AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Wilbur Newball

MATH030 · MATH0250383 · MATH25 · MATH34 · GEOMETRY · MATH0260637 · MATH026 · MATH26 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
13.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you can teach yourself the whole course from other resources.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSarcastic Figure-It-Out StyleDisorganized LecturesRude When QuestionedPop Quizzes and Made-Up TestsHigh Drop Rate
  • Most students describe rude sarcasm and .
  • Lectures and ; tests often cover untaught material.
  • A small minority like his unique style, but and warnings are grim.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some easy-A summer stats stories exist, but most geometry and intermediate courses punish unclear teaching with failed or dropped grades.

All evidence is in-person; outcomes swing by course from easy stats to brutal geometry.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Material is not inherently advanced, but poor organization and .

In-person only; geometry reviews are especially negative.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, yet several reviews mark it optional or not provided.

In-person evidence only; reports conflict across sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Roughly one in ; and warn others to stay away.

All reviews are in-person and heavily negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

, and unexplained exam scores leave students guessing how to improve.

Format shift

In-person only; graded-by-few-things and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework and and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant themes are sarcasm, ridicule, YouTube-only instruction, and figure-it-out-yourself philosophy.

Format shift

A few older positive outliers exist, but mass reviews rate teaching as terrible.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Homework, projects, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

In-person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections are widely called confusing, sarcastic, and .

Main concern

Asking questions often brings ridicule instead of help, so struggling students fall behind fast.

What students said

“Very rude and sarcastic professor. If you have a question, good luck getting a and also expect to get ridiculed for doing so.”
MATH25
“ and .”
MATH26
“No actual instruction only youtube videos, poor video quality at that.”
MATH34

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often include untaught or invented items, with and occasional refusal to review finals.

Made-Up Test QuestionsPop QuizzesUnclear RubricNo Exam Feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report , and no chance to review finals or understand scoring.

Made-Up Test QuestionsPop QuizzesNo Final Review
“ .”
MATH25
“did not let you see final exam nor explained why you got certain grade”
MATH34
“The in the workbook”
MATH0250383

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! Absolutely horrible teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 in-person reviews, highlighting sarcasm, disorganization, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ . Never available outside of class, often not even during class.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“You've been warned! Stay away. Avoid.”

🗣️ Classroom Tone

15/100

“Sarcasm should not be the only language spoken when being asked serious questions.”

📋 Organization

20/100

“Has absolutely no organized rubric, just assign random problems whether they were taught or not.”

Theme 1

😠 About Character

  • Pretty rude and sarcastic professor
  • expect to get ridiculed for doing so
  • he is just plain mean and has no respect for his students

Theme 2

📚 About Teaching

  • No actual instruction only youtube videos
  • His motto... is "figure it out yourself"
  • A simple subject thats terribly taught

Theme 3

📈

  • but grades none of it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two mostly older in-person reviews are highly consistent on tone and disorganization, supporting a .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH256 reviews
GEOMETRY4 reviews
MATH263 reviews
MATH343 reviews
MATH0262 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH0302 reviews
MATH02503831 review
MATH02606371 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2