AI Rate Professor

History

Antonella Vitale

HIIST052 · HIST057 · HIST47 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you like lecture-driven history and and Canvas materials are messy.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEnthusiastic LecturesUnclear InstructionsTough GraderParticipation MattersSlow Communication
  • Some students love her energetic, engaging history lectures and feel inspired
  • , and poor email response
  • Workload is often light with few graded items, but grading and organization feel inconsistent

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Several students earned A grades and called her an easy grader, but and .

In-person reviews split between easy grader and ; the online review warns of .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

History content is standard GE difficulty with lectures, a paper, and a presentation rather than extreme conceptual load.

Both formats describe moderate difficulty; and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most in-person reviewers report mandatory attendance, with one noting a 3% grade hit for illness.

In-person attendance is mandatory; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About 40% would take again; praise for lectures clashes with organization and communication complaints.

Positive recommendations are mainly in-person; online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student called her an easy grader, while and complained about attendance and .

Format shift

In-person evidence conflicts; online review leans tougher.

Workload

Light

62/100

Several comments note only a few graded items per semester, such as , and a presentation.

Format shift

; online mentions more reading and papers.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Engaging knowledgeable lectures for some and weak responsiveness for others.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and a limited set of major assignments more than constant exams.

Format shift

and presentation; online stresses papers and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person sections split between enthusiastic engaging lectures and , and slow replies.

Main concern

Organization and communication problems can erase the benefit of strong lecture energy.

What students said

“She's such an enthusiastic professor; she makes her lecture pretty engaging”
HiIST-052
“Don't ever get sick because your grade will go down 3%”
HiIST-052
“ while, sometimes not until the day it's due”
HIST-057

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review describes a fine but meticulous course with and .

Main concern

and tough grading can trip students seeking an easy online option.

What students said

“She can be a and ”
HIST47

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments typically include a midterm, a multi-page paper, and presentations .

One MidtermPaperPresentationGroup Activities

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work centers on one midterm, a 4-6 page paper, group presentation, and oral history style projects.

Midterm4-6 page paperGroup presentation
“There was one midterm, one 4-6 page paper, and a presentation due at the end of the class”
HiIST-052
“She doesn't give out clear instructions for ”
HiIST-052

Online

Online comments do not clearly describe proctoring; and reading-heavy work.

PapersReading-heavy
“She can be a and ”
HIST47

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's such an enthusiastic professor; she makes her lecture pretty engaging.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (1 online, 4 in person), highlighting lecture energy versus organization and communication problems. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎤 Lecture Energy

70/100

“She's such an enthusiastic professor; she makes her lecture pretty engaging”

📂 Organization Issues

35/100

“ while, sometimes not until the day it's due”

📬 Communication Gaps

30/100

“Don't except to get a response back by message from her for the whole semester”

👍 Split Recommendation

42/100

“She's a great teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • enthusiastic professor
  • interesting lectures
  • I felt valued by her and inspired to do well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She was an !
  • your grade will go down 3%

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization

  • Course materials online are not put on any easily navigable page

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews give useful detail but opinions are polarized and the single online sample is thin.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HiIST-0523 reviews
HIST-0571 review
HIST471 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values